Teams

N OR-WHRC-Dickinson

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Yongping Liu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.19
Steven Grant
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.12
Philip Mikolaj
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
3.06
Mitchell Todd
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.02
Scott Dickinson
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.02
Kirk Greiner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.91
Ian Schnadig
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Manoj Agnihotri
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Jonathan Guinn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Yongping Liu
68W–49L career
0%27%73%
3.20
3
Steven Grant
92W–60L career
0%26%74%
3.19
3
Philip Mikolaj
23W–13L career
0%48%52%
3.12
3
Mitchell Todd
42W–39L career
0%65%35%
3.06
3
Scott Dickinson
105W–81L career · type A
0%77%23%
3.02
3
Kirk Greiner
11W–7L career
0%76%24%
3.02
3
Ian Schnadig
37W–34L career
0%94%6%
2.91
3
Manoj Agnihotri
81W–117L career
0%98%2%
2.88
3
Jonathan Guinn
45W–76L career
1%98%1%
2.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.