Teams

NJ NAVY

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-04vs NJ REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesKenneth Earl / Carl Roberts vs William Santmyer / Greg Olson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-17vs BP REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Leoni / Kenneth Earl vs Harvey Wherry / Maurice Murray6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-10vs RHCC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesCraig Krastins / Kenneth Earl vs Mike Schrade / Stephen Komon4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-03vs LTC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarl Roberts / Kenneth Earl vs Steve Caulk / Chris Cuevas6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-26vs LTC SILVERLost 12
W#2 DoublesGary Tucker / Brett Moore vs Timothy Kuebler / Richard Treat5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKenneth Earl vs Farhad Noorbakhsh4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSean McClure / Dominic Perea vs Chet Paris / Michael Brown4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Carl Roberts
published 3.5
Brett Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kenneth Earl
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Matt Leoni
published
3.09
Craig Krastins
published 3.5
2.71
Dominic Perea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gary Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sean McClure
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Buxton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dominic Perea + Craig Krastins1439% games−3.6% vs expected
Carl Roberts + Craig Krastins4156% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Earl + Matt Leoni134 matchesnot enough data
Dominic Perea + William Buxton134 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Earl + Carl Roberts123 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Earl + Craig Krastins033 matchesnot enough data
Brett Moore + Dominic Perea123 matchesnot enough data
Carl Roberts + Dominic Perea123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carl Roberts
62W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Brett Moore
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Kenneth Earl
25W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Matt Leoni
60W–34L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Craig Krastins
36W–35L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Dominic Perea
8W–20L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
Gary Tucker
14W–26L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sean McClure
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
William Buxton
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.