Teams

PLEASANTON 18MX7.0B

2023 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Abby Sexton
published 4
3.63
Lloyd Hohenstein
published
3.58
Dan Helmer
published 3.5
3.54
Liliana Wang
published
3.47
Julie Gundermann
published
3.45
Gurupreet Chabda
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
3.15
Salvador Labrador
published
3.13
Angela Schmidt
published 3.5
3.07
Kyle Jones
published
2.98
Florita Labrador
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.91
Malou Matthew
published
2.85
Traci Rebiejo
published
2.52
Elaine Marshall
published
Eric Boehm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Salvador Labrador + Florita Labrador134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abby Sexton
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Lloyd Hohenstein
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Dan Helmer
37W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
Liliana Wang
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.54
Julie Gundermann
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Gurupreet Chabda
67W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Stephanie Chamberlin
21W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.40
Salvador Labrador
1W–13L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.15
3.5
Angela Schmidt
10W–25L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Kyle Jones
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Florita Labrador
70W–72L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Malou Matthew
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
Traci Rebiejo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Elaine Marshall
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Eric Boehm
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.