Teams

WALLENBERG PK 18MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-01vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18MX7.0EWon 10
W#2 DoublesXiaoyi Shi / Perry Lim vs Twinee Madan / Billy Yuen6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Yuewei Wang
published
3.84
Daniel Kroes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Seth Hazen
published
3.78
Vladan Popovic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
3.62
Avinash Viswanathan
published 3.5
3.60
Bonnie Chamchawee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.58
Bill Wei
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Yemia Hashimoto
published
3.52
Juan Pablo Q Weston
published
3.43
Alberto Mota
published 3.5
3.32
Laxman Subramanian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Perry Lim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Cynthia James
published 3.5
3.19
Ji Yeun Lee
published
2.97
Chengyu Chen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Chunhong Zhou
published 3
2.81
Yeping Hu
published
Xiaoyi Shi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laxman Subramanian + Bonnie Chamchawee213 matchesnot enough data
Yemia Hashimoto + Daniel Kroes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yuewei Wang
24W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Daniel Kroes
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Seth Hazen
24W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Vladan Popovic
23W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Muralidharan Jayavelan
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Avinash Viswanathan
19W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.62
3.5
Bonnie Chamchawee
83W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Bill Wei
29W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Yemia Hashimoto
37W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Juan Pablo Q Weston
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Alberto Mota
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Laxman Subramanian
120W–52L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Perry Lim
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
3.5
Cynthia James
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Ji Yeun Lee
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Chengyu Chen
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Chunhong Zhou
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Yeping Hu
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Xiaoyi Shi
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.