Teams

Gorham 55+ 6.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-09-27vs Redding/White 55+ 6.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesBobbi McEntee / Missy Chance vs Betty Haggard / Cindy Wood6-7, 1-6
2022-09-20vs COLE 55+ 6.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesLori Partagas / Bobbi McEntee vs Michelle Shoemaker / Rose Chrismon6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-06vs Farley/Wilkinson 55+ 6.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesBecky Kincaid / Bobbi McEntee vs Jan Whittaker / Medy Wurth3-6, 3-6
2022-08-16vs Shivaji 55+ 6.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesMissy Chance / Bobbi McEntee vs Suzanne Andia / Sandra Selley6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Cindy Cooke
published 3
3.31
Martha Cox
published
3.29
Judy Eaton
published
Becky Kincaid
published 3.5
Gina Carrick
published 3.5
2.89
Missy Chance
published
2.63
Lori Partagas
published
2.43
Bobbi McEntee
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Janet Gorham
published
Jennie Pekarne
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindy Cooke
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Martha Cox
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31
Judy Eaton
39W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Becky Kincaid
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gina Carrick
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Missy Chance
14W–32L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
Lori Partagas
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Bobbi McEntee
87W–103L career · 4 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.43
Janet Gorham
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennie Pekarne
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.