Teams

Causing a Racquet - Schaefer

2022 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-15vs T5- Broadlands/ PlaceWon 10
W#1 DoublesTara Brill / Kate Putt vs Margaret Amy Flaherty / Suzanne McMullen6-4, 6-1
2022-06-08vs Mood Swings - AVSPWon 10
W#3 DoublesTara Brill / Rachel McMichael vs Mary Beth Greason / Donna James6-2, 6-3
2022-06-06vs Mood Swings - AVSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Cardiff / Kate Putt vs Jeanne Dattilo / Angela Kane6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-01vs BOND Girls - PointerWon 10
W#3 DoublesRachel McMichael / Tara Brill vs Michelle Tenhaeff / Yesim Temeemi6-4, 6-4
2022-05-25vs T4- A. Farms/ ThedeWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarrie Cardiff / Robin Haast vs Britt Ellinger / Diane Schuler6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTara Brill / Tina Le vs Sheila Mead / Lori Hodsoll6-2, 6-3
2022-05-18vs T1- AVSP/ KotterWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarrie Cardiff / Robin Haast vs Alyson Frost / Stacie Kotter6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTara Brill / Kendall Mccaughey vs Taylor Marr / Christa Williams6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesTara Brill / Rachel McMichael vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-27vs BOND Girls - PointerWon 10
W#1 DoublesTara Brill / Lisa Zimmerman vs Deanne Iverson / Jen Kaine6-4, 7-5
2022-04-20vs T4- A. Farms/ ThedeWon 20
W#1 DoublesKendall Mccaughey / Tara Brill vs Britt Ellinger / Wendy Rose6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarrie Cardiff / Coni Schaefer vs Jennifer Hepler / Diane Schuler6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Tara Brill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Carrie Cardiff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Kendall Mccaughey
published
3.36
Tina Le
published
3.25
Anne Flam
published 3.5
3.19
Kate Putt
published
3.17
Coni Schaefer
published 3.5
3.07
Jeannie Matteson
published
2.97
Danielle Davis
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Flam + Coni Schaefer1446% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tara Brill
125W–88L career · 12 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Carrie Cardiff
90W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Kendall Mccaughey
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
Tina Le
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Anne Flam
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
Kate Putt
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Coni Schaefer
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Jeannie Matteson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Danielle Davis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.