Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW3.5B

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-26vs GLTF/GOLDMAN TC 18AW3.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesGrace Huang / Margaret Mitchell vs Abby Euyang / Yvonne Lin0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Eberhart / Anica Nangia vs Diana Motseniat / Nancy Wu2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesNina Brentlinger vs Alison Erhart0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jess Sterrett
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.62
3.48
Karen Toledo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.35
Jeanne Hoffman
published
3.32
Nilgun Reed
published
3.26
Cassie Coggeshall
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Becky Packard
published 3.5
3.06
Karen Schutten
published
2.99
Anica Nangia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Grace Huang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Jenny Le
published
2.86
Laura Lindow
published
2.67
Regina Eberhart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Ann Cleveland
published 3
2.54
Randi Kern
published
Nina Brentlinger
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Packard + Cassie Coggeshall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jess Sterrett
17W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Yanilsa Gonzalez-Ore
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
Karen Toledo
31W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Jeanne Hoffman
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.35
Nilgun Reed
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Cassie Coggeshall
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Becky Packard
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Karen Schutten
35W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Anica Nangia
3W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3.5
Grace Huang
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Jenny Le
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
Laura Lindow
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
Regina Eberhart
6W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
0%9%91%
2.67
3
Ann Cleveland
3W–16L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Randi Kern
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Nina Brentlinger
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.