Teams

SSLT TEAL

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-19vs PCRK REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJoey Rothman / Hallie Lombard vs Michelle Aikin / Barbara Gentry6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDana Henry vs Katie Hanna2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Taylor / Jo Anna Cline vs Julie Whipple / Sally Avery6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJan McClaren / Chris Darrow vs Ellen Kiniry / Debra Stamatis6-3, 6-2
2021-07-12vs PCC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesJoey Rothman / Hallie Lombard vs Ann Ripley / Beatrice NIelsen6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKristin Janos vs Maureen Gsand6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBea Barnes / Dana Henry vs Victoria Hostin / Bernadette Boston6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNola Nelson / Jan McClaren vs Tina Newlin / Julie Trent6-2, 6-2
2021-07-05vs CACI GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesMary Taylor / Sherri Kelleher vs Jodi Little / Stacey Anderson1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesDana Henry vs Sarah Springer5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoey Rothman / Bea Barnes vs Susan Ham / Elizabeth Leutwyler6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChris Darrow / Jan McClaren vs Cherie Weaver / Holly Kortum4-6, 1-6
2021-06-28vs SV REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesHallie Lombard / Joey Rothman vs Sherri Hutcheon / Krissy Hanna2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristin Janos vs Barbara Helmkamp4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Bea Barnes vs Shannon Bice / Lori Driscoll6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNola Nelson / Sherri Kelleher vs Heather Stohlton / Patricia Ackerman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-06-21vs CPV BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Mary Taylor vs Britney Anderson / Traci Heffron2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Janos vs Michelle Havard6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoey Rothman / Hallie Lombard vs Christine Cutler / Mira Brand4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBea Barnes / Dana Henry vs Susan Miles / Anthea Gerberg6-3, 6-4
2021-06-14vs VCC ORANGEWon 31
W#1 DoublesHallie Lombard / Mary Taylor vs Kristen Adams / Danelle Morgan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBea Barnes vs Debbie Groves4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChris Darrow / Jan McClaren vs Holly Flora / Susan Stewart6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNola Nelson / Sherri Kelleher vs Terra Croke / Theresa Holyer7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2021-06-07vs LTFC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesJoey Rothman / Hallie Lombard vs Cathie Frazzini / Amy Chase7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDana Henry vs Laura Ray5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Darrow / Jan McClaren vs Colleen Frank / Jennifer Solimene6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Taylor / Jo Anna Cline vs Danielle Martines / Phuong Palmeiro6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Dana Henry
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Chris Darrow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Bea Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.64
Nola Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Joey Rothman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Hallie Lombard
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Jan McClaren
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jo Anna Cline
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kristin Janos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sherri Kelleher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan McClaren + Nola Nelson3252% games+5.9% vs expected
Kristin Janos + Bea Barnes3350% games+1.7% vs expected
Jan McClaren + Chris Darrow122045% games−1.6% vs expected
Joey Rothman + Hallie Lombard41145% games−2.3% vs expected
Joey Rothman + Bea Barnes0739% games−9.9% vs expected
Jan McClaren + Joey Rothman1439% games−10.1% vs expected
Sherri Kelleher + Nola Nelson2350% gamesnot enough data
Jan McClaren + Bea Barnes314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Henry
95W–80L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Chris Darrow
17W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Bea Barnes
34W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
Nola Nelson
20W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Joey Rothman
37W–80L career · 6 lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
Hallie Lombard
8W–14L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jan McClaren
25W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jo Anna Cline
25W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin Janos
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherri Kelleher
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.