Teams

WRAC-Res Ipsa

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-28vs PFAC/CP-CramerWon 30
W#1 DoublesKenneth Lowe / David Jaquish vs Clinton Marvel / Bruno Caprez6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTom Rechtin / Steve Gundersen vs David Roth / Andrew Anderson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJim Kellogg / Steve Ovenell vs Bruce Hunt / Francis Demateis6-3, 6-1
2024-04-27vs EW-PC-KohanLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Jaquish / Kenneth Lowe vs Craig Hansen / Moe Davari3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Bendtsen / Stephen Knox vs Emmitt Jackson / Daryl Brown6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Gundersen / Tom Rechtin vs Marc Spinner / John Hilmes3-6, 4-6
2024-04-27vs YTC-FergusonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Gundersen / Tom Rechtin vs Ron Hartley / David Whiteside6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJim Kellogg / Steve Ovenell vs Rick Vaughan / Mark Cherry6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStephen Knox / Michael Bendtsen vs Terry Kempton / Terry Keenhan6-2, 6-0
2024-04-26vs WCCP-WillmanWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephen Knox / Michael Bendtsen vs Ray Willman / John Omlin4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKenneth Lowe / David Jaquish vs Jeffrey Gillespie / Robert Vancott3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteve Ovenell / Jim Kellogg vs Michael Moloney / Andre LaSalle6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Jaquish
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jim Kellogg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kenneth Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Bendtsen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Knox
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Gundersen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Ovenell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tom Rechtin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Rechtin + Jim Kellogg3247% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Knox + Michael Bendtsen3266% gamesnot enough data
Tom Rechtin + Michael Bendtsen224 matchesnot enough data
Tom Rechtin + Stephen Knox033 matchesnot enough data
Tom Rechtin + Steve Gundersen123 matchesnot enough data
Steve Ovenell + Jim Kellogg213 matchesnot enough data
David Jaquish + Kenneth Lowe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Jaquish
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jim Kellogg
17W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kenneth Lowe
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Bendtsen
67W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Knox
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Gundersen
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Ovenell
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Rechtin
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.