Teams

Kulas - All About That Ace

2024 Virginia Beach Adult 18 & Over · Virginia Beach Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesCatherine Wynne / Beth Kulas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-04vs CamdenLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Elizabeth Peterson vs Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz / Christina Bartholomew4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Wynne / Beth Kulas vs Erin Camden / Tammy Willett2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-28vs Mueller/Karla SmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Elizabeth Long vs Carrie Coleman / Kathryn Fraim5-7, 3-6
2024-05-21vs HalterLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Catherine Wynne vs Tessa Robinson / Stephanie Granger0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Kulas / Erica Ashcraft vs Courtney Kellam / Anne Marie Burroughs1-6, 2-6
2024-05-07vs KindleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeth Kulas / Elizabeth Long vs Jennifer Kindley / Denise Makowski6-2, 6-1
2024-04-30vs CamdenWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Elizabeth Peterson vs Betty Domanski / Chelsea Jennings6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Lori Cox
published
3.61
Alyse Chickey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Elizabeth Peterson
published
3.43
Liz Martin
published
3.35
Beth Skolnick
published 3.5
3.29
Kristyn Hedley
published
3.28
Beth Kulas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Janet Brashear
published
3.13
Jenna DeLigio
published
2.96
Erica Ashcraft
published
2.80
Faye Downey
published
2.80
Stephanie Bowen
published
Elizabeth Long
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyse Chickey + Elizabeth Peterson7654% games+3.0% vs expected
Beth Skolnick + Beth Kulas3353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Cox
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Alyse Chickey
97W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.61
Elizabeth Peterson
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
Liz Martin
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Beth Skolnick
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Kristyn Hedley
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Beth Kulas
78W–73L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Janet Brashear
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Jenna DeLigio
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Erica Ashcraft
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
Faye Downey
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.80
Stephanie Bowen
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Elizabeth Long
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.