Teams

SDNC 4.0 Lomas SF/ Goodman

2026 SoCal Fall Doubles WE- SDNC · SDNC Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.79 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings14 teams · SDNC Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SDNC 4.0 RBCTC/ Mourey000000
2SDNC 4.0 La Costa/ Flaherty000000
3SDNC 4.0 Brengle Terrace/ Coughlin000000
4SDNC 4.0 RBS&TC/ Louis000000
5SDNC 4.0 FRCC/ Loew000000
6SDNC 4.0 FRCC/ Hackett000000
7SDNC 4.0 San Dieguito TC/ Rubin000000
8SDNC 4.0 La Valle CC / Manheim000000
9SDNC 4.0 Rancho Del Oro/ Fernandez000000
10SDNC 4.0 Rancho Valencia/ Makkar000000
11SDNC 4.0 Lomas SF/ Goodman000000
12SDNC 4.0 Rancho Del Oro/ Roy000000
13SDNC 4.0 RPTC/ Yeem000000
14SDNC 4.0 FRCC/ Lozano000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Ian Vytopil
published 4
3.75
Grant Goodman
published 4
3.72
Kent Olson
published
3.68
Chris Maudlin
published 4
3.64
William McGuigan
published
3.63
Keith Greener
published
3.62
Jeff Lyle
published
3.50
Steven DeMatteo
published
3.46
Tim MacH
published 3.5
3.45
3.27
Ian Falcon
published 3.5
3.22
Arthur Lawida
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ian Vytopil + Grant Goodman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ian Vytopil
18W–12L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Grant Goodman
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Kent Olson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Chris Maudlin
8W–15L career · type S · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
William McGuigan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
Keith Greener
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jeff Lyle
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Steven DeMatteo
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.50
3.5
Tim MacH
10W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
4
Christopher Lavine
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Ian Falcon
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Arthur Lawida
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.