Teams

ACAC Bucheit

2025 Richmond Mixed 55 & Over · Richmond Mixed 55 & Over 6.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.08 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-29vs MAC HayesWon 30
W#1 DoublesWHIT BALDWIN / Anne Townsend vs Aditya Chavan / Melinda Staples4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHamilton Bryan / Kim Martin vs John Ward / Ruth Bates6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRoberto Sarmento / Pamela Blackburn vs Mark Chronis / Nancy Broaddus6-2, 6-4
2025-07-28vs MAC HayesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJudy Forbes / Joey Townsend vs Dorothy Hillgrove / Lawrence Golixer7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaphne Cole / Roberto Sarmento vs Stacy Sherdel / Mark Chronis6-0, 6-2
2025-07-22vs MAC HayesLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Lilly / Robert Thoms vs Stacy Sherdel / Aditya Chavan6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNancy Yglesias / Roberto Sarmento vs Ruth Bates / John Ward2-6, 6-5
L#3 DoublesJoey Townsend / Pamela Blackburn vs Jeannette FRALIN / Todd Manning5-7, 0-3
2025-07-15vs MAC HayesWon 10
W#2 DoublesKen Lowenstein / Margaret Peters vs Todd Manning / Melinda Staples7-5, 6-4
2025-07-14vs MAC HayesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJudy Forbes / Ken Lowenstein vs Jeannette FRALIN / Todd Manning6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPamela Blackburn / Joey Townsend vs Bernice White / Lawrence Golixer6-1, 6-2
2025-06-17vs MAC HayesWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Yglesias / Joey Townsend vs Lawrence Golixer / Bernice White6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaphne Cole / Robert Thoms vs Dorothy Hillgrove / Mark Chronis6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesWHIT BALDWIN / Anne Townsend vs Nancy Broaddus / Paul Haynes6-2, 6-2
2025-06-10vs MAC HayesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudy Forbes / Ken Lowenstein vs Stacy Sherdel / Todd Manning6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDaphne Cole / Robert Thoms vs Melinda Staples / John Ward6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Peters / Roberto Sarmento vs Jeannette FRALIN / Aditya Chavan7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-03vs MAC HayesWon 21
W#1 DoublesDave Booth / Michelle Lilly vs Anne Wolff / Ralph Novak3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Martin / Hamilton Bryan vs Bernice White / Lawrence Golixer2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Blackburn / Corey Winston vs Aditya Chavan / Stacy Sherdel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 55 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Dave Bucheit
published 3.5
3.29
Anne Townsend
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Michelle Lilly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Roberto Sarmento
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Ken Lowenstein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Dave Booth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Joey Townsend
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Margaret Peters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Daphne Cole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Robert Thoms
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Pamela Blackburn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Corey Winston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.14
Laura Bucheit
published
2.14
Hamilton Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Judy Forbes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Yglesias
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
WHIT BALDWIN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Townsend + Hamilton Bryan3442% gamesnot enough data
Dave Bucheit + Laura Bucheit0525% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Blackburn + Joey Townsend134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dave Bucheit
19W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Anne Townsend
33W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Michelle Lilly
50W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04
Roberto Sarmento
21W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Ken Lowenstein
18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Dave Booth
19W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Joey Townsend
16W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Margaret Peters
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Daphne Cole
20W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Robert Thoms
16W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Pamela Blackburn
28W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Corey Winston
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Laura Bucheit
3W–27L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Hamilton Bryan
12W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Judy Forbes
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Yglesias
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
WHIT BALDWIN
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.