Teams

CWOOD - L. Gregory

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.15 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 SinglesRaquel Pullaro vs Lauren Mehta0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Nail / Karen Wingard vs Erin Forehand / Heather Gold6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBecky Kuntz / Christina Pedraza vs Amy Parmer / Elizabeth Provenzano1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesValerie Carrillo / Nathalie Crane vs Pamela Woodham / Kasia Dolinska-Timoszuk6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKristin Nail vs Kathleen Daciek6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLacy Gregory / Raquel Pullaro vs Cindy Sparks / Jan Sayad6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristina Pedraza / Jennifer Noll vs Pamela Gonzalez / Siwon Jang6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-18vs Avila - A. StaffordWon 21
W#1 DoublesLacy Gregory / Kristin Nail vs Anne Stafford / Joy Themides6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesBecky Kuntz vs Giliane Rifai2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesValerie Carrillo / Nathalie Crane vs Yeon Thomas / Michelle Fitz-Randolph6-3, 6-2
2025-03-03vs Westchase Fireballs - P. HayesLost 13
W#1 DoublesLacy Gregory / Karen Wingard vs Nicole Tamulski / Anna Richardson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristina Pedraza / Lauren Constantine vs Natalie Kuhn / Cara Anderson2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRaquel Pullaro vs Trina Ashour6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErika Sumner / Becky Kuntz vs Megan Ma / Amy Ramos5-7, 4-6
2025-02-10vs HCC SMOKE SHOW - E. FiltmanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKristin Nail / Lauren Constantine vs Jennifer Duglin / Marisol Cohen6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBecky Kuntz / Laura Pennington vs Chrissy Lambert / Barbara Castro2-6, 2-6
2025-02-03vs Buckhorn Sweetspots - S. NewsomWon 31
W#1 DoublesLacy Gregory / Karen Wingard vs Stacy Durbin / Sara Newsom6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristin Nail / Christina Pedraza vs STEPHANIE Hardin / Kim Sverdlow7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBecky Kuntz vs Amanda Smith7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErika Sumner / Raquel Pullaro vs Merbaliz Ferris / Barbara Kouimanis3-6, 3-6
2025-01-27vs Van Dyke Farms - P. MooreWon 30
W#1 DoublesLacy Gregory / Karen Wingard vs Wendy Corn / Kathleen Roberts6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristin Nail / Karen Wilhelm-Mace vs Christy Seal / Sue Maxwell6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRaquel Pullaro / Laura Pennington vs Karen Sanford / Cherie Adkins6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-13vs Arbor Greene - K. CoffeyWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Wingard / Kristin Nail vs Crystal Vanmeter / Rebecca Gaier6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLacy Gregory / Karen Wilhelm-Mace vs Neha Bishnoi / Amy Butts6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBecky Kuntz / Christina Pedraza vs Carrie Lacy / Christine Sullivan6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Karen Wingard
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.27
Ashley Gagne
published 3.5
3.25
Lacy Gregory
published
3.19
Kristin Nail
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.08
Christina Pedraza
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.07
Nathalie Crane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Karen Wilhelm-Mace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Becky Kuntz
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Daniela Zeballos
published 3
2.69
Erika Sumner
published 3
2.69
Raquel Pullaro
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.65
Jennifer Noll
published
2.57
Lauren Constantine
published
2.33
Laura Pennington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Wingard + Kristin Nail24363% games+11.9% vs expected
Raquel Pullaro + Becky Kuntz7753% games+10.5% vs expected
Becky Kuntz + Erika Sumner8257% games+3.9% vs expected
Nathalie Crane + Karen Wingard3249% games−1.8% vs expected
Karen Wilhelm-Mace + Christina Pedraza5070% gamesnot enough data
Becky Kuntz + Christina Pedraza4160% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Nail + Christina Pedraza5063% gamesnot enough data
Erika Sumner + Jennifer Noll224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karen Wingard
117W–68L career · 10 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ashley Gagne
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Lacy Gregory
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Kristin Nail
80W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.19
3
Christina Pedraza
77W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Nathalie Crane
56W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.07
3
Karen Wilhelm-Mace
32W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Becky Kuntz
53W–62L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Daniela Zeballos
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Erika Sumner
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Raquel Pullaro
72W–68L career · 9 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Jennifer Noll
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Lauren Constantine
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.57
Laura Pennington
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.