Teams

Combs - Gates Four

2023 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-18vs Hallock - MazarickLost 01
L#3 DoublesDenise Bauer Frazier / Betty Peterson vs Morgan Hylton / Shani Gates2-6, 1-6
2023-07-11vs Haugh-HighlandWon 10
W#3 DoublesDenise Bauer Frazier / Erica Huskey vs Susan Miller / Caroline Garber6-0, 6-1
2023-06-28vs Hallock - MazarickLost 01
L#3 DoublesDenise Bauer Frazier / Theresa Jones vs Shani Gates / Morgan Hylton3-6, 3-6
2023-06-06vs Klinck - MazarickLost 01
L#3 DoublesDenise Bauer Frazier / Betty Peterson vs Melissa Parker / Marcela Ovalle0-6, 2-6
2023-05-30vs Hallock - MazarickWon 10
W#3 DoublesTheresa Jones / Betty Peterson vs Sandra Martin / Shani Gates6-1, 6-3
2023-05-16vs Klinck - MazarickLost 01
L#3 DoublesErica Huskey / Denise Bauer Frazier vs Melissa Parker / Marcela Ovalle4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amanda Maxey
published 4
3.41
Pia Thompson
published
3.11
Kathy Fick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.08
Yvonne Rouse
published
3.02
Lynn Floyd
published
2.90
Corinna Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Tammy Keller
published
2.70
Denise Bauer Frazier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Betty Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.55
Gwenda Combs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Keller + Denise Bauer Frazier3643% gamesnot enough data
Yvonne Rouse + Tammy Keller4448% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Fick + Denise Bauer Frazier6260% gamesnot enough data
Corinna Williamson + Kathy Fick2546% gamesnot enough data
Pia Thompson + Corinna Williamson3253% gamesnot enough data
Corinna Williamson + Tammy Keller3257% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Floyd + Corinna Williamson134 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Floyd + Tammy Keller134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Maxey
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pia Thompson
17W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Kathy Fick
126W–95L career · 8 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11
Yvonne Rouse
27W–28L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Lynn Floyd
33W–45L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Corinna Williamson
122W–100L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.90
Tammy Keller
24W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Denise Bauer Frazier
64W–77L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
2.5
Betty Peterson
38W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%25%75%
2.60
Gwenda Combs
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.