← Teams

IRV-Harrington/Gleason

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.1 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Lucia Parker
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.06
Monica Conners
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
Erin Gleason
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published 3.5
2.85
Michelle Boucher
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.81
Amy Marr
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results14 ties
2024-09-15Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesErin Gleason / Brooke Kuerbis vs Shannon Gerritzen / Maria Smith6-2, 6-2
2024-09-14Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesBrooke Kuerbis / Erin Gleason vs Danielle Marston / Maria Smith6-2, 6-0
2024-08-17Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesErin Gleason / Brooke Kuerbis vs Amanda Yaris / Ying-Chieh Chen6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-06-30Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesErin Gleason / Kelley Malama vs Jennifer Stevenson / Kathleen Cooney6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichelle Boucher / Sarie Crothers vs Nancy Lo / Margo Yohner6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-29Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesErin Gleason / Julia Plowman vs Haihua Su / Julie Ahn6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Sampson / Michelle Boucher vs Yuxia Ouyang / Liz Theeuws6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-06-28Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesErin Gleason / Heather Matteri vs Autumn Bunch / Shannon Darrow6-1, 7-5
2024-03-31Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMichelle Boucher / Amy Marr vs Vanessa Weber / Brittany Benson7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErin Gleason / Sarah Sasek vs Michelle Bunje / Amelia Ryan6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracy Laidley / Lucia Parker vs Sue Dockstader / Jaime Hamilton6-2, 6-1
2024-03-23Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesLucia Parker / Yasmine Foroud vs Michelle Ellett / Karin Owens7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErin Gleason / Allison Ferre vs Kate Unterberger / Erin Mader6-3, 6-1
2024-03-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMonica Conners / Sarah Sasek vs Erin Doucet / Cynthia Ross-Brockett6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLucia Parker / Michelle Boucher vs Theresa Hagerty / Cindy Bennett6-3, 7-6
2024-02-25Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesErin Gleason / Allison Ferre vs Julie Kafoury / Meagan Lake6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSarah Sasek / Amy Marr vs Sarah Bracelin / Megan Heyworth6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKirsten Sessions / Lucia Parker vs Lynn Brown / Nancy Lo6-4, 3-4
2024-02-17Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesEmily Harrington / Erin Gleason vs Saahiti Penigalapati / Natasha Brady6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Sasek / Monica Conners vs Michelle Roach / Jody Yates6-2, 6-0
2024-02-09Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAmy Marr / Monica Conners vs Michelle Cortez / Thao Nguyen7-6, 6-4
2024-01-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKelley Malama / Michelle Boucher vs Karen Kraus / Christine Egan6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLucia Parker / Sarah Sasek vs Sheryl Riley / Kristin Morris6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Marr / Monica Conners vs Molly Albright / Ilona Vondolovski6-4, 7-6
2024-01-21Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesErin Gleason / Emily Harrington vs Michelle Robbins / Jean Zuber Marshburn6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Sasek / Amy Marr vs Sarah Larson / Karen Kraus6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Lucia Parker
50W–35L career
0%63%37%
3.07
3
Monica Conners
34W–9L career
0%64%36%
3.06
3.5
Erin Gleason
43W–17L career
35%65%0%
3.02
3
Michelle Boucher
45W–40L career
1%93%6%
2.85
3
Amy Marr
32W–21L career
0%99%1%
2.81

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.