Teams

Kauna’oa

2024 Adult 65 and Over League · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WEST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-05vs Mauna KeaWon 20
W#1 DoublesFreya Jones / Keely Rochon vs Margaret Hind / Lisa Ebrahimi6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarsha Speck / Shauna Miller vs Theresa Scripps / Esther Hughes1-0
2024-09-29vs Mauna KeaWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarsha Speck / Susan Webber vs Theresa Scripps / Jill Wallace4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlice Shingle / Shauna Miller vs Lisa Ebrahimi / Margaret Hind6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-09-29vs Mauna KeaWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoni Izumi-Nakamoto / Sue Brown vs Lisa Ebrahimi / Theresa Scripps6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Webber / Shauna Miller vs Esther Hughes / Margaret Hind2-0
W#3 DoublesMarsha Speck / Alice Shingle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Sue Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Joni Izumi-Nakamoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Shauna Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Susan Webber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Marsha Speck
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Alice Shingle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Keely Rochon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Freya Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Webber + Shauna Miller7259% games+20.5% vs expected
Alice Shingle + Susan Webber71049% games+3.3% vs expected
Marsha Speck + Susan Webber4161% gamesnot enough data
Marsha Speck + Keely Rochon0539% gamesnot enough data
Alice Shingle + Marsha Speck213 matchesnot enough data
Freya Jones + Keely Rochon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sue Brown
56W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
Joni Izumi-Nakamoto
44W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Shauna Miller
66W–71L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
Susan Webber
33W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Marsha Speck
28W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Alice Shingle
27W–26L career · 1 line in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
Keely Rochon
13W–38L career · 1 line in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
Freya Jones
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.