Teams

Bednarz

2022 55&Over Women Metro · 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.14 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-24vs Metro: Gould/TharinWon 21
L#1 DoublesEllen Amstutz / Nancy Aranow vs Kate Green / Christine Rodeo1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Bednarz / Patty Reitkopf vs Nancy Fila / Helen Xu7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShalini Abeyaratne / Caroline Bailey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-18vs Metro: Gould/TharinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaroline Bailey / Shalini Abeyaratne vs Kathie McDermott-Greene / Terri Ezratty2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPatty Reitkopf / Elizabeth Bednarz vs Patricia Gould / Christine Rodeo6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-08-10vs Metro: Gould/TharinLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Sizer / Ellen Amstutz vs Kathie McDermott-Greene / Terri Ezratty1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Aranow / Alma Weinstein vs Patricia Gould / Chih-Wei Chen1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTamara Glenny / Laura Adler vs Nancy Fila / Alexandra MacDonnell3-6, 2-6
2022-08-04vs Metro: Gould/TharinLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Bednarz / Naziha Aldaia vs Kate Green / Alexandra MacDonnell0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShalini Abeyaratne / Alma Weinstein vs Helen Xu / Nancy Fila2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-27vs Metro: Gould/TharinLost 03
L#1 DoublesNaziha Aldaia / Alma Weinstein vs Elizabeth Gormley / Gail Shube2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTamara Glenny / Ilene Miklos vs Chih-Wei Chen / Catherine Tharin3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Bednarz / Shalini Abeyaratne vs Terri Ezratty / Kathie McDermott-Greene0-6, 1-6
2022-07-21vs Metro: Gould/TharinLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Bednarz / Sonia Naoum vs Jeanne Straus / Catherine Tharin2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Adler / Tamara Glenny vs Chih-Wei Chen / Geraldine Lucid0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShalini Abeyaratne / Katriona Kearney vs Christine Rodeo / Helen Xu0-6, 3-6
2022-07-13vs Metro: Gould/TharinLost 03
L#1 DoublesNaziha Aldaia / Sonia Naoum vs Elizabeth Gormley / Gail Shube2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Adler / Ellen Amstutz vs Jeanne Straus / Catherine Tharin0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizete Groenendaal / Susan Sizer vs Chih-Wei Chen / Geraldine Lucid0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Ellen Amstutz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Caroline Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Ilene Miklos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Elizete Groenendaal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Alma Weinstein
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elizabeth Bednarz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.68
Nancy Aranow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Katriona Kearney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Adler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Naziha Aldaia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patty Reitkopf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shalini Abeyaratne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sonia Naoum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Sizer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tamara Glenny
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ilene Miklos + Ellen Amstutz2347% games−2.1% vs expected
Sonia Naoum + Naziha Aldaia101942% games−3.3% vs expected
Ellen Amstutz + Elizete Groenendaal3536% games−11.5% vs expected
Susan Sizer + Elizete Groenendaal3349% gamesnot enough data
Susan Sizer + Ilene Miklos0531% gamesnot enough data
Susan Sizer + Ellen Amstutz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ellen Amstutz
14W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3
Caroline Bailey
8W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3.5
Ilene Miklos
32W–57L career · 1 line in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Elizete Groenendaal
119W–105L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Alma Weinstein
11W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Bednarz
10W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Nancy Aranow
66W–138L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Katriona Kearney
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Laura Adler
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Naziha Aldaia
11W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patty Reitkopf
25W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shalini Abeyaratne
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sonia Naoum
16W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Sizer
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tamara Glenny
8W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.