Teams

Volley Girls

2022 Baltimore Adult 18 & Over · Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.20 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-06-21Won 20
W#1 DoublesCarisa Husak / Claire Taylor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEileen Hewat / Dianna Sinofsky vs Jennifer Guertin / Jennifer Grow6-1, 7-5
2022-06-18vs Fast n FuriousWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Rauhofer / Beth van Derslice vs Rachel Ravalico / Heather Nesti6-1, 7-6
2022-06-16vs The Green TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Rauhofer / Carisa Husak vs Heather Burnside / Karen Graveline6-0, 7-5
2022-06-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarisa Husak / Dianna Sinofsky vs Jennifer Coles / D Michelle Cooper6-1, 6-0
2022-06-03vs The Green TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Rauhofer / Beth van Derslice vs Karen Graveline / Cheryl Royce6-2, 6-2
2022-05-22vs No Strings AttachedWon 20
W#1 DoublesShannon Biggs / Beth van Derslice vs Irma Purisch / Monica Belle6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarisa Husak / Dianna Sinofsky vs Pamela Mary Gogol / Jennifer Coles7-5, 7-5
2022-05-21Won 10
W#2 SinglesDianna Sinofsky vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMELODY KELLY / Dianna Sinofsky vs Kristen Burke / Zsuzsanna McMahan1-6, 4-6
2022-05-15vs No Strings AttachedWon 30
W#1 DoublesLena Brandenburg / Carisa Husak vs Jennifer Coles / Pamela Mary Gogol7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEileen Hewat / Dianna Sinofsky vs Michele Brill / Laura Garcia1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBeth van Derslice vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-01vs Fast n FuriousLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rauhofer / Beth van Derslice vs Anastasia Nardangeli / Nikki Alworth4-6, 3-6
2022-04-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Rauhofer / Beth van Derslice vs Sharon Boswell / Jennifer Coles6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Beth van Derslice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Carisa Husak
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Lena Brandenburg
published 3
3.09
Laura Lewandowski
published
2.98
Claire Taylor
published 3
2.77
Dianna Sinofsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.75
Shannon Biggs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianna Sinofsky + Carisa Husak213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth van Derslice
57W–33L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Carisa Husak
56W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3
Lena Brandenburg
93W–74L career · no lines in 2022
<1%10%90%
3.16
Laura Lewandowski
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
3
Claire Taylor
25W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.98
3
Dianna Sinofsky
43W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Shannon Biggs
18W–30L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.