Teams

Dream Crushers

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-08vs Anthony's AcesLost 04
L#1 DoublesRuss Baker / Charleston Yu vs Joe Buckwalter / Anthony Brooks2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGregory Bidwell vs Willy Stone3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Cotton / Patrick Rumley vs Brock Steller / Marco Terracciano2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Bittner / Chris Owens vs PAUL RISSE / Zachary Vincent3-6, 2-6
2021-05-08vs Anthony's AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Bittner / Charleston Yu vs Willy Stone / Joe Buckwalter6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Leonard / Gregory Bidwell vs Anthony Brooks / Adam Choi6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChris Owens / Alan Green vs Brock Steller / PAUL RISSE3-6, 2-6
2021-05-07vs Anthony's AcesLost 04
L#1 DoublesGary Cox / Russ Baker vs Willy Stone / Marco Terracciano0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPatrick Rumley vs Joe Buckwalter3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Cotton / Michael Leonard vs Adam Choi / Zachary Vincent4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlan Green / Charleston Yu vs Brock Steller / PAUL RISSE6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Anthony's Aces03111571
2Dream Crushers0311123133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
William Cotton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Charleston Yu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Michael Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.76
Patrick Rumley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Alan Green
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Chris Owens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gary Cox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Gregory Bidwell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
Russ Baker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Bidwell + Alan Green1532% games−13.9% vs expected
William Cotton + Russ Baker224 matchesnot enough data
William Cotton + Michael Leonard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
William Cotton
20W–47L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Charleston Yu
22W–15L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Michael Leonard
38W–51L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Patrick Rumley
37W–35L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
0
Alan Green
20W–39L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Chris Owens
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Gary Cox
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
0
Gregory Bidwell
27W–54L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Russ Baker
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.