Teams

LVTA PURPLE

2026 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-17vs LT NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Seager / Wendy Thomas vs Lynn Arenson / Kim Phillips6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Ritchie / Valerie Hecker vs Jill Brooks / Karen Beach6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSonda Huhta / Joan Parker vs June Ellen Feil / Shelli Friesen7-5, 6-1
2026-06-11vs HMTC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesLori Buderus / Debra Netzel vs Meredith Lorick / Vicki Davis2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Clay / Jennifer Schafer vs Sara Fedel / Trish Lebsack2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Ritchie / Valerie Hecker vs Nancy McIlvenna / Paige Gilles4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-04vs LT SILVERWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Abercrombie / Sonda Huhta vs Becky Rosetti-Solley / Alison Earnhart5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Thomas / Melissa Seager vs Rachel Levalley / Brittney Stephenson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Ritchie / Lynn Clay vs SeonAh Kendall / Jen Guernsey6-4, 6-3
2026-05-28vs FCCC BRONZEWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Buderus / Debra Netzel vs Dierdre Sadeh / April Walden6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Abercrombie / Sonda Huhta vs KELLY KHAN / Maggie Clark6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWendy Thomas / Jennifer Schafer vs Aileen VanMeveren / Kelli Barber6-1, 6-0
2026-05-21vs LT NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesSonda Huhta / Melissa Seager vs Kim Phillips / Lynn Arenson3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDebra Netzel / Linda Abercrombie vs Wendy Schaffer / June Ellen Feil6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoan Parker / Jennifer Schafer vs Eileen Heath / Christine Houldsworth3-6, 3-6
2026-05-07vs HMTC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesSonda Huhta / Amy Ritchie vs Vicki Davis / Meredith Lorick0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Seager / Linda Abercrombie vs Nancy McIlvenna / Colleen Muhlbradt4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Thomas / Valerie Hecker vs Trish Lebsack / Paige Gilles6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Lori Buderus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Wendy Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Amy Ritchie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Sonda Huhta
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.81
Debra Netzel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Melissa Seager
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Valerie Hecker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Joan Parker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Lynn Clay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Linda Abercrombie
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Jennifer Schafer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Hecker + Amy Ritchie4254% games+8.3% vs expected
Amy Ritchie + Wendy Thomas13956% games+4.2% vs expected
Lori Buderus + Debra Netzel9452% games+0.9% vs expected
Lynn Clay + Linda Abercrombie4745% games−10.0% vs expected
Valerie Hecker + Sonda Huhta8357% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Hecker + Wendy Thomas314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Schafer + Joan Parker134 matchesnot enough data
Lori Buderus + Wendy Thomas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lori Buderus
55W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.96
Wendy Thomas
43W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Amy Ritchie
43W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Sonda Huhta
98W–85L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Debra Netzel
69W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Melissa Seager
40W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Valerie Hecker
77W–115L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Joan Parker
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.52
Lynn Clay
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Linda Abercrombie
28W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.47
Jennifer Schafer
19W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.