Teams

KY/LOU/TICHENOR/RADASCH

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.40 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-22vs KY/LOU/GRANT/LEFFERTWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichele Horn / Karen Hamilton vs Ciara Warren / Erin Grant7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJennifer Dawn Haas-Travis vs Tatiana Pobst4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSoojung Jung / Holly Tichenor vs Erin Staley / Abbie Leffert7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDolores Radasch vs Vongmany Edmonds6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKristy Dugan / Revonda Green vs Kristy Smith / Patricia Wortley1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-07vs KY/LOU/COOMESWon 31
W#1 DoublesEllana Bessen / Deborah Wathen vs Stephanie English / Debbie Widman6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJodi Martin / Revonda Green vs Meg Coomes / Carrie Ehrhard7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSmitha Bullock vs Brittany Brice1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSoojung Jung / Yuriko Kido Tron vs Kathryn Barrott / Whitney Jamie6-0, 6-2
2025-02-02vs KY/LOU/DAHLEM/O'CONNELLLost 14
L#1 DoublesVanya Smith / Karen Hamilton vs Claire Burrows / Lisa Bruneau3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDolores Radasch vs Juliana Ihnen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Tichenor / Christie Wafford vs Alison Scott / Shaheen Khan6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJennifer Dawn Haas-Travis vs Jessica Faulkner2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichele Horn / Jodi Martin vs Lindsey Newcomer / Nicole Topper4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-01-25vs KY/LOU/BROWN/SCHMIDTLost 05
L#1 DoublesHolly Tichenor / Vanya Smith vs Cammie O'Connell / Kelly Brown4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Dawn Haas-Travis vs Cassidy McCracken3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlice Shade / Brooke Montgomery vs Sarah Hanson / Ruth Taylor0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDolores Radasch vs Casey Vidal3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJodi Martin / Karen Hamilton vs Julia Mackenzie-Rollinson / Jenny O'Donnell3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Vanya Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Christie Wafford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Michele Horn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Soojung Jung
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Jennifer Dawn Haas-Travis
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.28
Dolores Radasch
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.27
Deborah Wathen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Ellana Bessen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Holly Tichenor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Revonda Green
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Alice Shade
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Brooke Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Kristy Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Smitha Bullock
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Jodi Martin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Allison Luckett
published 3
Yuriko Kido Tron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Wafford + Holly Tichenor2449% games+5.8% vs expected
Ellana Bessen + Deborah Wathen3262% games+3.2% vs expected
Vanya Smith + Michele Horn2351% games+2.7% vs expected
Holly Tichenor + Alice Shade224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vanya Smith
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Christie Wafford
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Michele Horn
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Soojung Jung
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Jennifer Dawn Haas-Travis
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Dolores Radasch
12W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Deborah Wathen
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Ellana Bessen
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Holly Tichenor
12W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Revonda Green
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Alice Shade
20W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Brooke Montgomery
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Kristy Dugan
16W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Smitha Bullock
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Jodi Martin
5W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
3
Allison Luckett
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Yuriko Kido Tron
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.