Teams

HOA/Muller/55&Over6.0W

2022 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 6.0 Combo - Women - 55

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-18vs Hooper, AnneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanet Crawford / Heidi McIntyre vs Anne Hooper / Mary Marks6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSonya Muller / Megan Viviano vs Linda Friedel / Sibley Frye6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-11vs Hooper, AnneSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKim Pulford / Ann Cronkhite vs Anne Hooper / Sibley Frye0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Crawford / Julie Fuller vs Katherine Farrington / Tamra Mays6-7, 5-3, 1-0
2022-06-04vs Hooper, AnneLost 12
W#1 DoublesSonya Muller / Patricia Cowen vs Anne Hooper / Mary Marks6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHeidi McIntyre / Jane Olson vs Kim Klein / Sibley Frye6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Carle / Sabrina Alexander vs Katherine Farrington / LOIS HERR3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-21vs Hooper, AnneWon 21
L#1 DoublesMegan Viviano / Sabrina Alexander vs Anne Hooper / Kelly Jackson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Cronkhite / Julie Fuller vs Tamra Mays / Sibley Frye6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Pulford / Heidi McIntyre vs Laurie Mair / Katherine Farrington5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-14vs Hooper, AnneWon 21
L#1 DoublesJane Olson / Maryanne Loscalzo vs Kim Klein / Jennifer Bailey0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Cowen / Julie Fuller vs Mindy Smith / Sibley Frye6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Cronkhite / Sonya Muller vs Katherine Farrington / LOIS HERR4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-05-07vs Hooper, AnneWon 21
L#1 DoublesKim Pulford / Christine Carle vs Edgy Sack / Sibley Frye4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPatricia Cowen / Maryanne Loscalzo vs Tamra Mays / Mindy Smith6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJanet Crawford / Sonya Muller vs Katherine Farrington / Mary Marks6-2, 6-1
2022-04-30vs Hooper, AnneWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaryanne Loscalzo / Megan Viviano vs Mindy Smith / Anne Hooper6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJanet Crawford / Patricia Cowen vs Kim Klein / Jennifer Bailey4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSabrina Alexander / Jane Olson vs Linda Friedel / Mary Marks7-6, 6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Combo - Women - 55
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Muller/55&Over6.0W5212922184
2Hooper, Anne2581329207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Sonya Muller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Patricia Cowen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Janet Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Megan Viviano
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Maryanne Loscalzo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Heidi McIntyre
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Ann Cronkhite
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Kim Pulford
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Julie Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Christine Carle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jane Olson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sabrina Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Crawford + Patricia Cowen6353% games+7.6% vs expected
Julie Fuller + Patricia Cowen2346% games+4.8% vs expected
Janet Crawford + Sonya Muller3350% games−0.2% vs expected
Julie Fuller + Ann Cronkhite4642% games−0.8% vs expected
Ann Cronkhite + Kim Pulford4846% games−2.8% vs expected
Megan Viviano + Heidi McIntyre3348% games−6.1% vs expected
Sonya Muller + Megan Viviano81542% games−6.7% vs expected
Julie Fuller + Kim Pulford5946% games−7.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonya Muller
74W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Patricia Cowen
64W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Janet Crawford
85W–105L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Megan Viviano
61W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Maryanne Loscalzo
32W–100L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Heidi McIntyre
51W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Ann Cronkhite
55W–107L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
Kim Pulford
33W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.46
Julie Fuller
36W–110L career · 3 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.46
2.5
Christine Carle
39W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jane Olson
15W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sabrina Alexander
26W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.