Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW4.0C

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Anthea Pang
published 4
3.81
Lilian Kim
published
3.75
Kayo D'Arcy
published
3.75
Lindsay Tonderys
published
3.49
Alison Erhart
published 3.5
3.43
Sandy Scaife
published
3.38
Sherri Glenn
published
3.34
Shan Lu
published
3.28
Paula Mangin
published
3.25
Tonya Vincent
published
3.25
Katherine Alevizos
published
3.24
Jennifer Koo
published
3.11
Jing Gu
published
Shelley Aanes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherri Glenn + Tonya Vincent5451% games+1.5% vs expected
Paula Mangin + Sandy Scaife123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthea Pang
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
Lilian Kim
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.81
Kayo D'Arcy
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Lindsay Tonderys
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.75
3.5
Alison Erhart
35W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Sandy Scaife
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Sherri Glenn
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.38
Shan Lu
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.34
Paula Mangin
14W–23L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Tonya Vincent
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Katherine Alevizos
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Jennifer Koo
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Jing Gu
14W–29L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Shelley Aanes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.