Teams

The Sunsetters

2026 SoCal Doubles 18&Over -- WEEKDAY WOMEN · Ventura Women 4.0 WD

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · Ventura Women 4.0 WD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CanniBALLS000000
2Malibu Smokin Aces WD000000
3WAC Pack000000
4Get a grip000000
5Mission Oaks Wrecking Balls000000
6Sherwood Superstars000000
7The Sunsetters000000
8Ballers R us000000
9Pink Moments000000
10North Ranch CC 4.0000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Shelly Costello
published
3.95
Lori Lundring
published
3.88
Lan Chao
published
3.69
Heather McGregor
published
3.68
Jackie Steffen
published
3.58
Wyne Quinn
published 4
3.57
Sharon Li
published
3.45
Laura Berger
published
3.41
Ina Kim
published
3.23
Jennifer Meckfessel
published
2.96
Marie Smith
published
Lisa Assouad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather McGregor + Lan Chao6258% games+11.0% vs expected
Shelly Costello + Lori Lundring11256% games−1.5% vs expected
Sharon Li + Heather McGregor4252% games−4.0% vs expected
Wyne Quinn + Lan Chao404 matchesnot enough data
Ina Kim + Laura Berger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelly Costello
11W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.95
Lori Lundring
11W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Lan Chao
23W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Heather McGregor
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Jackie Steffen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Wyne Quinn
103W–92L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Sharon Li
13W–10L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Laura Berger
12W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Ina Kim
14W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.41
Jennifer Meckfessel
30W–10L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Marie Smith
14W–17L career · no lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Lisa Assouad
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.