Teams

Sawgrass Rendzio

2025 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Summer Weekend · 6.5 W Saturday

18 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-14vs Duval/BulginLost 03
L#1 DoublesAisling Toby / Joan Grune vs Elizabeth Lovelace / Meredith Hoffmann1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Felsing / Stacey Mayer vs Emily Painter / Isabelle Milne4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesStacy Rendzio / Lauren Daly vs Vanessa Holland / Margaret Gulliford2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-13vs FYC KaneLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Reeves / Diane Atteberry vs Ashli Nixon / Elizabeth Smith6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBetsy Delcour / Beth Jones vs Tammy Morreale / Renee' Kirkland3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesErica Chigounis / Tulin Lopez vs Caroline Welch / Katie Culp2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-12vs SJCC RoarLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Atteberry / Lindsay Long vs Nancy Hennessy / Katie Lazzara6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Werba / Lauren Stroker vs Heather Riley / Amy Malaikham1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Knarr / Tulin Lopez vs Amanda Blocker / Ali Griffin1-6, 3-6
2025-08-14vs Harbour Island BlunckWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Felsing / Stacey Mayer vs Mary Miele / Jolene Merritt6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesVanessa Sutliff / Joan Grune vs Heather LeShane / Eliza Ander6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesErica Chigounis / Lauren Daly vs Laurie Sage / Trish Goodwin6-3, 6-2
2025-08-02vs Williams Y TownsendLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrittany Darling / Joan Grune vs Katie Milligan / Christina Rigby2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Rendzio / Beth Jones vs Heather Parrish / Traunia Senior6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErica Chigounis / Susan Conlin vs Carsyn Morse / Christie Morse3-6, 6-6
2025-07-19vs Deercreek CC PhillipsWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrittany Darling / Lauren Stroker vs Julie Korsog / Ceci Hassan6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Jones / Betsy Delcour vs Robin Braddock / Carolyn Whittall6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoan Grune / Vanessa Sutliff vs Carson Lee Phillips / Reba Shrewsbury6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Christina Felsing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Aisling Toby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Stacy Rendzio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Brittany Darling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Betsy Delcour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.19
Diane Atteberry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Vanessa Sutliff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Stacey Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Lindsay Long
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Jennifer Werba
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Erica Chigounis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Joan Grune
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Tulin Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Susan Conlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Susan Reeves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Melissa Knarr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Lauren Stroker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lauren Daly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Mayer + Susan Reeves5162% games+9.0% vs expected
Stacey Mayer + Lindsay Long6071% games+8.9% vs expected
Tulin Lopez + Susan Conlin4266% games−0.8% vs expected
Aisling Toby + Joan Grune213 matchesnot enough data
Joan Grune + Stacey Mayer213 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Delcour + Tulin Lopez123 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Mayer + Tulin Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Darling + Lindsay Long213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Felsing
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
Aisling Toby
31W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Stacy Rendzio
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Brittany Darling
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Betsy Delcour
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
3.5
Diane Atteberry
5W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Vanessa Sutliff
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Stacey Mayer
23W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Lindsay Long
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Jennifer Werba
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Erica Chigounis
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Joan Grune
15W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Tulin Lopez
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Susan Conlin
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Susan Reeves
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Melissa Knarr
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Lauren Stroker
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Lauren Daly
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.