Teams

HPence (Pine Lake)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Men - Mon PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-30vs CJacobs/CRabidou (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSam Basden / Howard Pence vs Robert Marlowe / Carl Jacobs1-6, 0-6
2024-09-23vs MMerkel (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSam Basden / Wayne Burgamy vs Trey Farley / Lawrence Kraujalis3-6, 1-6
2024-09-09vs TCary (Windyrush)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarc Swann / Kelvin Day vs Darden Blow / Calebe Figueiredo6-7, 4-6
2024-08-26vs BGibson (WSRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMarc Swann / Keith Wheatley vs Sijo Joseph / MAGESH ARUMUGAM5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-12vs MMerkel (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarc Swann / Sam Basden vs Keith Lowe / Lawrence Kraujalis0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

AJ Krahn
published 3.5
3.17
Donald VanCott
published 3.5
3.08
Marc Swann
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Jim Boyles
published
2.99
Howard Pence
published 3.5
2.81
Wayne Burgamy
published
Don Moseley
published 3
Erik Krenz
published 3
2.60
Sam Basden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Keith Hargis
published
Keith Wheatley
published
Kelvin Day
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marc Swann + Sam Basden2629% gamesnot enough data
Jim Boyles + AJ Krahn224 matchesnot enough data
Marc Swann + Howard Pence134 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Burgamy + Sam Basden033 matchesnot enough data
Don Moseley + Erik Krenz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
AJ Krahn
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Donald VanCott
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Marc Swann
28W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jim Boyles
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Howard Pence
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
Wayne Burgamy
2W–19L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.81
3
Don Moseley
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Erik Krenz
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Sam Basden
6W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
Keith Hargis
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Keith Wheatley
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelvin Day
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.