Teams

Leon- Beers (Forestmeadows)

2023 Leon Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-19vs Bahorski (Forestmeadows)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary MacKo / Margaret Mooney vs Deborah Chaves / Lauren Clary4-5
2023-03-12vs Bahorski (Forestmeadows)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDiane Dove / Kimberly Miller vs Carol Bahorski / Chris Savery6-4, 6-4
2023-02-26vs Bahorski (Forestmeadows)Split 11
L#2 DoublesAndrea Baker / Diane Dove vs Nancy Hough / Gayle Nelson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMollie Palmer / Mary MacKo vs Carol Bahorski / Linda Hudson6-0, 6-1
2023-02-19vs Bahorski (Forestmeadows)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBeverly Kemp / Mary MacKo vs Catherine McRae / Liz Jordan5-7, 3-6
2023-02-12vs Bahorski (Forestmeadows)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Dove / Andrea Baker vs Liz Jordan / Chris Savery6-4, 6-3
2023-02-05vs Bahorski (Forestmeadows)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBeverly Kemp / Mary MacKo vs Terese Combs / Linda Huffman6-4, 7-6
2023-01-29vs Bahorski (Forestmeadows)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Baker / Diane Dove vs Terese Combs / Linda Huffman7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Mariann Sabolic
published
3.13
Deborah Beers
published 3.5
2.91
Diane Dove
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Beverly Kemp
published 3
2.38
Andrea Baker
published 3
Jan Murdock
published
Kimberly Miller
published
Margaret Mooney
published
Mary MacKo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Klucher
published
Sally Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Dove + Andrea Baker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mariann Sabolic
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Deborah Beers
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Diane Dove
51W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Beverly Kemp
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Andrea Baker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.38
Jan Murdock
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Miller
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Mooney
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary MacKo
81W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Klucher
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sally Davis
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.