Teams

CCV Hall/Gardner 5.0

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 5.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-08vs HCC Morrissett/Berens 5.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Elizabeth Wallace vs Jamie Cochrane / Kim Morrissett3-6, 2-6
2025-05-18vs HCC Morrissett/Berens 5.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Lea Doise vs Lindsey Howard / Susan Hanson1-6, 3-6
2025-05-17vs Belmont Meyer/Campbell 5.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Gardner / ANN HALL vs Jill Campbell / Nellina Wooten4-6, 4-6
2025-05-03vs Belmont Meyer/Campbell 5.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesANN HALL / Lea Doise vs Jennifer Grinnell / Julia Monroe6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLucy Davis / Mary C Nesbitt vs Jill Campbell / Ashley Schmitz4-6, 2-6
2025-04-12vs Belmont Meyer/Campbell 5.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Gardner / Katherine Carnohan vs Jill Campbell / Nellina Wooten1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.70
ANN HALL
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.52
Katherine Carnohan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
4.30
Beth Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Lucy Davis
published
4.16
Erin Waters
published
Lea Doise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary C Nesbitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
ANN HALL
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.70
4.5
Katherine Carnohan
70W–52L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.52
4.5
Beth Gardner
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
4.30
Lucy Davis
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Erin Waters
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
Lea Doise
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary C Nesbitt
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.