Teams

Top Hit Singles

2024 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-11vs First Serve 3.0Won 10
W#3 SinglesEmily Schabacker vs Angela Sharma4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-18vs AvengersLost 01
L#1 SinglesEmily Schabacker vs Yucong Gao2-6, 0-6
2024-08-12vs First Serve 3.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Schabacker vs Kyung Haw Sung6-0, 6-1
2024-07-21vs First Serve 3.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesEmily Schabacker vs Shari Gronvall6-7, 4-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Mia Dentoni
published
2.95
Laura Feiveson
published
2.94
Emily Schabacker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.94
Lenora Rigby
published
2.87
Tanna Nelson
published
2.80
Margaret Cornelius
published
2.75
Jennifer Lin-Liu
published
2.33
Wendy Wicker
published
Bonnie Skafte
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mia Dentoni
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
Laura Feiveson
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Emily Schabacker
158W–173L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
2.94
Lenora Rigby
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
2.94
Tanna Nelson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Margaret Cornelius
14W–20L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80
Jennifer Lin-Liu
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Wendy Wicker
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.33
2.5
Bonnie Skafte
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.