Teams

Hunters Green Power Players - A. McKenna

2021 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-17vs Cheval - B. BurdetteSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJolanta Lagowski / Roseann McNichol vs Dawn Kay / Blanca Crespo6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLita Arroyo / Lisa Marinez vs Joanne Hurley / Barbara Ingham1-6, 1-6
2021-05-10vs FH Sweetspots - C. DemingLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudith Butler / Lisa Marinez vs Susan MOSHER / Deb Spears1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Rairigh / Kasia Dolinska-Timoszuk vs Catherine Davidson / STEPHANIE Hardin2-6, 3-6
2021-05-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJolanta Lagowski / Amy Rairigh vs Raquel Mateos / Monica Gonzalez3-6, 5-7
2021-04-26vs Davis Island Serve Aces - L. NeroLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoseann McNichol / Amy Rairigh vs Tobey Hartigan / Carole Jahns3-6, 2-6
2021-04-23vs Westchase Winners - K. DeAngeloSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJolanta Lagowski / Jihea Helme vs Natalie Kuhn / Nicole Tamulski2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRoseann McNichol / Amy Rairigh vs Kyle Roberts / Carmen Fiorito1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-12vs VD Farms - P. MooreLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Rairigh / Roseann McNichol vs Wendy Corn / Linda Frank6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne McKenna / Jolanta Lagowski vs Cindy Arment / Tricia Cardoso2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLita Arroyo / Amy Rairigh vs Carol Guidera / Debi O'Hara2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Lisa Marinez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.74
Amy Rairigh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Colleen Lenaghan
published 3
2.66
Risa Blake
published
2.57
Jihea Helme
published
2.55
Roseann McNichol
published
2.33
Anne McKenna
published 3
Jolanta Lagowski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Marinez + Colleen Lenaghan6547% games−7.1% vs expected
Amy Rairigh + Jolanta Lagowski3545% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Marinez
122W–115L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Amy Rairigh
33W–44L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Colleen Lenaghan
15W–17L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
Risa Blake
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
Jihea Helme
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
2.57
Roseann McNichol
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Anne McKenna
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
90%10%<1%
2.33
Jolanta Lagowski
45W–64L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kasia Dolinska-Timoszuk
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.