Teams

PRC Spirited Warriors Spring

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WE

14 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-27vs Game Set SunsetWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoanah Greenspan / Nathalie Smith vs Lisa Assouad / Ina Kim7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMichelle McManigal vs Shannon Ellis4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesYang Ja Ballard / Rebekah Wellik vs SANDI WISE / Julie Clark6-4, 6-1
2026-06-21vs V-LLW Royally Fun-ChaoLost 13
W#1 DoublesMelissa Berndt / Nathalie Smith vs Heather Morganson / Summer Williamson6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesYang Ja Ballard vs Keely McKnight1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeanette McLaughlin / Danna Riordan vs Judy Su / Lan Chao3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRebekah Wellik / Denise McNulty vs Stacey Iwata / Lorene Miller2-6, 0-6
2026-06-14vs Royal Court QueensWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoanah Greenspan / Yang Ja Ballard vs Kristine Werner / Mariana Sullivan6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNathalie Smith / Jeanette McLaughlin vs Lisa Kapur / Patti Wilson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBarbara Connelly / Julie Porrazzo vs Yolanda Johnson / Denise Modglin6-3, 6-3
2026-06-07vs Ojai PixiesLost 13
L#1 DoublesJulie Porrazzo / Danna Riordan vs Joy Henning / Debra Blackwell-Schrag2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle McManigal vs Courtney Andrews2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Koenig / Megan Butler vs Kathrina Cruz / Kelly Jensen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAkemi Martin / Rebekah Wellik vs Kirsten Johnston / Heather Miller4-6, 3-6
2026-05-30vs WACsadaisicalSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBarbara Connelly / Julie Porrazzo vs Janet Fang-Putinier / Tanja Daniel2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle McManigal vs Michelle Ha6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJeanette McLaughlin / Nathalie Smith vs Christina Desai / Lisa Doan1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Koenig / Megan Butler vs Pamela Shuken / Karen Walker6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-05-16vs Malibu Smokin Aces WESplit 22
W#1 DoublesMelissa Berndt / Akemi Martin vs Vicki Levin / Kathleen Feig6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesYang Ja Ballard vs Rebecca Lobl6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDenise McNulty / Rebekah Wellik vs Maureen Weston / Aimee Butcher4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNathalie Smith / Barbara Connelly vs Denise Sheffield / Erin von Watts2-6, 1-6
2026-05-02vs Mission Oaks Smart AcesSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJacqui Burge / Joanah Greenspan vs Beverly Aronson / Paula Medina6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesYang Ja Ballard vs Kasia Domenech6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle McManigal / Nathalie Smith vs Jamie Culhane / Kristina Weaver4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAkemi Martin / Rebekah Wellik vs Tracee Nilsson / Valerie Yuan3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Ventura - Women 4.0 WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1V-LLW Royally Fun-Chao7022615179
2PRC Spirited Warriors Spring43141432232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Yang Ja Ballard
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Melissa Berndt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Joanah Greenspan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Barbara Connelly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Jacqui Burge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Michelle McManigal
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.69
Danna Riordan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Julie Porrazzo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Akemi Martin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Nathalie Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Ann Gallimore
published 4
3.59
Lauren Koenig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Jeanette McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Denise McNulty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Berndt + Akemi Martin7454% games+0.9% vs expected
Michelle McManigal + Yang Ja Ballard134 matchesnot enough data
Yang Ja Ballard + Jacqui Burge224 matchesnot enough data
Yang Ja Ballard + Akemi Martin314 matchesnot enough data
Joanah Greenspan + Nathalie Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Connelly + Julie Porrazzo213 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Connelly + Jacqui Burge213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yang Ja Ballard
137W–73L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Melissa Berndt
48W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Joanah Greenspan
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Barbara Connelly
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Jacqui Burge
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Michelle McManigal
100W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Danna Riordan
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Julie Porrazzo
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Akemi Martin
73W–91L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
Nathalie Smith
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Ann Gallimore
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Lauren Koenig
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Jeanette McLaughlin
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Denise McNulty
1W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.