Teams

TCary (Windyrush)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Men - Mon PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-30vs BGibson (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesIan Klass / Calebe Figueiredo vs Dhruv Bhatt / Nicholas LeCroy1-6, 1-6
2024-09-25vs MMerkel (Park Crossing)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDarden Blow / Tommy Cary vs Rick Haskell / Matthew Merkel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-23vs NBaumgarten (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDarden Blow / Calebe Figueiredo vs William Barnes / Taylor Dillon6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Tynan / Tommy Cary vs Max Ferraro / Max Garner6-4, 6-3
2024-09-09vs HPence (Pine Lake)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDarden Blow / Calebe Figueiredo vs Marc Swann / Kelvin Day7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMatt Livoti / Tommy Cary vs Don Moseley / Wayne Burgamy6-4, 6-2
2024-08-26vs CJacobs/CRabidou (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMatt Livoti / Tommy Cary vs Ornob Roy / Ray Linder6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-08-22vs BGibson (WSRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDarden Blow / Philip Prince vs Dhruv Bhatt / Nicholas LeCroy0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Tynan / Tommy Cary vs Joel Fleury / Bruce Gibson7-5, 6-4
2024-08-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Tynan / Tommy Cary vs Nils Mattsson / Alex Hutchins6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Ian Klass
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.59
Darden Blow
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.43
John Tynan
published
3.20
Matt Livoti
published
3.13
Tommy Cary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Daniel Wielunski
published 3.5
3.04
Jarrett Nester
published
Philip Prince
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darden Blow + Ian Klass15760% games+4.5% vs expected
Ian Klass + Tommy Cary213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ian Klass
79W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Darden Blow
42W–30L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
John Tynan
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
Matt Livoti
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Tommy Cary
26W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Daniel Wielunski
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jarrett Nester
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Philip Prince
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.