Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Utgaard

2022 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.5W

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-12vs Sports Mall-Heikkila/SimpsonSplit 11
W#1 Female SinglesSusan Picou vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 Female DoublesCyndi Jones / Olivia Hu vs Lynette Duran / Kandice Taylor2-6, 4-6
2022-12-05vs Sports Mall-KastelerWon 20
W#1 Female SinglesCyndi Jones vs Laura Johnston6-2, 6-3
W#2 Female DoublesRenee Utgaard / Susan Picou vs Carlene Kemp / Martsie Earl7-5, 4-2
2022-11-28vs Ivory Ridge-StonerWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesCyndi Jones vs Tracy Derby6-4, 6-2
2022-11-14vs Sports Mall-Heikkila/SimpsonSplit 11
W#1 Female SinglesCyndi Jones vs Lynette Duran6-4, 6-3
L#2 Female DoublesRenee Utgaard / Kristi Roggensack vs Catherine Bliss / Kandice Taylor6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-11-07vs Sports Mall-KastelerWon 20
W#1 Female SinglesCyndi Jones vs Katie Zimmerman6-4, 4-2
W#2 Female DoublesKristi Roggensack / Renee Utgaard vs Amy Hansen / Elizabeth Thomas6-3, 3-1
2022-10-31vs Ivory Ridge-StonerLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesCyndi Jones / Kristi Roggensack vs Heather Allen / Jen Langston5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Laura Savage
published
4.27
Cyndi Jones
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Christina Mooney
published 4.5
4.15
Susan Picou
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Victoria Lara
published
3.97
Olivia Hu
published
3.88
Kristi Roggensack
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Renee Utgaard
published 4
LIZ CARLSON
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Utgaard + Laura Savage6356% games+2.3% vs expected
Christina Mooney + LIZ CARLSON353351% games−1.9% vs expected
Susan Picou + Laura Savage4351% games−2.3% vs expected
Kristi Roggensack + Renee Utgaard131150% games−2.6% vs expected
Renee Utgaard + Susan Picou4359% gamesnot enough data
Kristi Roggensack + Christina Mooney4152% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Lara + Laura Savage314 matchesnot enough data
Olivia Hu + Renee Utgaard314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Savage
116W–64L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
4.46
4.5
Cyndi Jones
154W–124L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Christina Mooney
60W–46L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Susan Picou
178W–77L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
Victoria Lara
59W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
4.11
Olivia Hu
72W–65L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Kristi Roggensack
126W–91L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Renee Utgaard
156W–111L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
LIZ CARLSON
45W–50L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.