Teams

Wynlakes-Engles

2025 · 2026 Fall USTA 55 & Over Day League - Montgomery

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 2026 Fall USTA 55 & Over Day League - Montgomery have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Diane Locke
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.50
Mary Brazell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.34
Lisa Zanglin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.23
Debbie Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Tonya Lee
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Ann Barton
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Carrie Rhodes
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Wyvonne Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.07
Florence Tyson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Sandra Engles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Rhodes + Ann Barton10262% games+17.2% vs expected
Ann Barton + Sandra Engles4640% games+2.7% vs expected
Lisa Zanglin + Diane Locke191156% games+2.3% vs expected
Debbie Olsen + Mary Brazell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Locke
61W–28L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.57
Mary Brazell
23W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.50
Lisa Zanglin
34W–36L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Debbie Olsen
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Tonya Lee
11W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Ann Barton
19W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Carrie Rhodes
27W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Wyvonne Johnson
10W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Florence Tyson
9W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Sandra Engles
4W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.