Teams

LOCH.Cockayne

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-12vs MD.MoncriefWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Cockayne / Lisa Capetanos vs Jennifer Alviano / Sheridan Orr6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPam Letts / Katie Nolfi vs Paula Bullock / Laurie Godfrey1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Finucane / Susan Wisdom vs Kari Moncrief / Jennifer Crumpler6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Lisa Swank
published
2.82
Lisa Capetanos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Erin Cockayne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.62
Susan Wisdom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Lisa Sockett
published
2.35
Andrea Finucane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.34
Katie Nolfi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Kimberly Shames
published
2.21
Pam Letts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Heather Dannels
published
Zubeda Paruk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Cockayne + Lisa Capetanos13755% games+10.3% vs expected
Andrea Finucane + Pam Letts033 matchesnot enough data
Erin Cockayne + Susan Wisdom033 matchesnot enough data
Katie Nolfi + Heather Dannels033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Swank
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Lisa Capetanos
41W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
2.5
Erin Cockayne
50W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
0%12%88%
2.67
3
Susan Wisdom
65W–102L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Lisa Sockett
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
2.5
Andrea Finucane
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Katie Nolfi
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Kimberly Shames
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Pam Letts
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Heather Dannels
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Zubeda Paruk
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.