Teams

NAZ/Fetty/18&over/3.5M

2026 Adult 18 & Over - NAZ · NAZ 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-28vs WebbLost 13
W#1 DoublesLandon Fetty / David Logan vs Bob Guzley / Derek Miller7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesShaun Stouder vs Blake Cain2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBruce Ryan / Eric Nielsen vs Ron Gray / Rich Stephens6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Harbeck / Darrin Schain vs Steven Danner / Michael Chan4-6, 6-7
2026-03-28vs WebbLost 13
W#1 DoublesLandon Fetty / David Logan vs Bob Guzley / Rich Stephens2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShaun Stouder vs Eli Cohen3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRuss Blunck / Brian Harbeck vs Michael Chan / Derek Miller2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMark Kaiser / Eric Nielsen vs Ron Gray / Steven Danner2-6, 3-6
2026-02-22vs WebbSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDavid Logan / Landon Fetty vs Cory Berry / Bob Guzley6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKevin Felix vs Eli Cohen6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPeter Stivers / Eric Nielsen vs Ron Gray / Derek Miller0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMark Kaiser / Brian Harbeck vs Chadleo Webb / Michael Chan5-7, 2-6
2026-02-22vs WebbSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKevin Felix / Scott van Vleet vs Bob Guzley / Derek Miller6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLandon Fetty vs Cory Berry6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrian Harbeck / Peter Stivers vs Chadleo Webb / Steven Danner5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMark Kaiser / Eric Nielsen vs Eli Cohen / Michael Chan1-6, 0-6
2026-02-07vs WebbWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Logan / Scott van Vleet vs Bob Guzley / Derek Miller6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLandon Fetty vs Cory Berry7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKevin Felix / Bruce Ryan vs Eli Cohen / Rich Stephens6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRuss Blunck / Brian Harbeck vs Chadleo Webb / Steven Danner3-6, 1-6
2026-02-07vs WebbSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLandon Fetty / David Logan vs Bob Guzley / Cory Berry1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKevin Felix vs Eli Cohen6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPeter Stivers / Eric Nielsen vs Rich Stephens / Derek Miller2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRuss Blunck / Brian Harbeck vs Chadleo Webb / Steven Danner1-6, 2-6
2026-01-31vs WebbWon 31
W#1 DoublesLandon Fetty / Shaun Stouder vs Bob Guzley / Cory Berry6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKevin Felix vs Derek Miller6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPeter Stivers / Bruce Ryan vs Eli Cohen / Rich Stephens5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMark Kaiser / Scott van Vleet vs Ron Gray / Michael Chan6-3, 6-2
2026-01-31vs WebbLost 13
W#1 DoublesBruce Ryan / David Logan vs Cory Berry / Derek Miller6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLandon Fetty vs Eli Cohen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEric Nielsen / Kevin Felix vs Bob Guzley / Rich Stephens6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShaun Stouder / Darrin Schain vs Chadleo Webb / Michael Chan6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NAZ 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Scott van Vleet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Bruce Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.29
David Logan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Eric Nielsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Shaun Stouder
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Kevin Felix
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
3.00
Brian Harbeck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Mark Kaiser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Landon Fetty
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
2.88
Peter Stivers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Russ Blunck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Darrin Schain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott van Vleet + David Logan404 matchesnot enough data
Landon Fetty + David Logan404 matchesnot enough data
Brian Harbeck + Russ Blunck033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott van Vleet
98W–100L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Bruce Ryan
4W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
David Logan
23W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Eric Nielsen
0W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Shaun Stouder
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.10
Kevin Felix
19W–4L career · 10 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Brian Harbeck
10W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Mark Kaiser
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Landon Fetty
11W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
Peter Stivers
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
Russ Blunck
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Darrin Schain
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.