Teams

MPTC - Mixed Drinkers

*2025 Houston Fall League (2024) NA - Sunday Mixed Doubles · 8.0 Mixed

19 players · average NTRP 4.12 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-24vs MPTC - X ForceWon 10
W#3 DoublesSpencer Blum / Rachel Howie vs Tracy Martin / Van Truong6-2, 6-2
2024-10-20vs MPTC - X ForceWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Howie / Weston Hill vs Mary Scaief / Victor Lee4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Rachel Howie
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.40
Stephanie Dudzinski
published
4.39
Joshua Ku
published
4.28
Katharina Beyer
published
4.22
Leigh Martin
published
4.22
4.22
Christopher Riley
published 4.5
4.17
4.15
Hailey Wilson
published 4
4.10
Basia Walters
published 4
3.85
Ernest Wang
published 4
3.79
Amanda Heineman
published 4
3.67
Spencer Blum
published
3.56
Weston Hill
published
Gabriella DePascual
published 3.5
Eric Grose
published
Kien Luu
published
Lauren Brooks
published
Meghan Nguyen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Spencer Blum + Hailey Wilson7357% games+2.3% vs expected
Weston Hill + Leigh Martin5348% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Heineman + Ernest Wang6069% gamesnot enough data
Weston Hill + Katharina Beyer303 matchesnot enough data
Ernest Wang + Katharina Beyer303 matchesnot enough data
Eric Grose + Stephanie Dudzinski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Howie
59W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.65
Stephanie Dudzinski
58W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.40
Joshua Ku
36W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.39
Katharina Beyer
33W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
4.28
Leigh Martin
23W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Diego Martinez Nogueron
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Christopher Riley
31W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Goncalo Martins da Silva
17W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Hailey Wilson
30W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
4.15
4
Basia Walters
30W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
4.10
4
Ernest Wang
48W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Amanda Heineman
21W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Spencer Blum
33W–14L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Weston Hill
23W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Gabriella DePascual
8W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eric Grose
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kien Luu
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Brooks
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Meghan Nguyen
33W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.