Teams

Sedgwick2

2025 18&Over Men · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.29 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-12vs YMCA 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMatthew Harvey vs Prashant Kaul1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Umina / Dana Cartwright vs Shing Chin / David Panasci3-6, 4-6
2025-07-05vs SYR: SFTC - WallensteinLost 04
L#1 DoublesWilliam Ferguson / Matthew Harvey vs Jonathan Dee / Norifumi Urao2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMike Heinz vs Nathanael Kelley1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDan Ferguson / JP Sabourin vs Jay Lee / Ben Weiss3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDana Cartwright / Philip Smith vs Stephen Nesspor / Andrew Wallenstein0-6, 3-2
2025-06-28vs SYR: SFTC - WallensteinLost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Gould / Matthew Harvey vs Jonathan Dee / Stephen Nesspor1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMike Heinz vs Michael DeLaney6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDana Cartwright / JP Sabourin vs Jay Lee / Peter Smith2-6, 2-6
2025-06-21vs YMCA 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Harvey / JP Sabourin vs David Panasci / Fenghua Li2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDana Cartwright / Adolfo Gonzalez Garza vs Neil Hoyt / Yi Zhang2-6, 3-6
2025-06-14vs SYR: SFTC - WallensteinLost 04
L#1 DoublesGururaj Krishnan / William Ferguson vs Stephen Nesspor / Norifumi Urao0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesZunli Lu vs Michael DeLaney4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Harvey / JP Sabourin vs Marcus J Brooks / Kyle Voyer0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDan Ferguson / Adolfo Gonzalez Garza vs Kevin Garvey / Ben Weiss0-6, 2-6
2025-05-17vs YMCA 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPhilip Smith / Evan Prosser vs Fenghua Li / Xiwu Sun5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Umina / Gururaj Krishnan vs Amro Mohamed / Anthony Farella2-6, 5-7
2025-05-10vs SYR: SFTC - WallensteinLost 03
L#1 SinglesZunli Lu vs Marcus J Brooks1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDana Cartwright / Thomas Umina vs Stephen Nesspor / James Vacco2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMike Heinz vs Kyle Voyer6-7, 5-7
2025-05-03vs YMCA 3.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesDan Ferguson / Gururaj Krishnan vs Fenghua Li / Karl Offen6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Harvey / William Ferguson vs Yi Zhang / Neil Hoyt6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMike Heinz vs James Burgess6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesThomas Umina / Dana Cartwright vs Prashant Kaul / Amro Mohamed3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YMCA 3.553221840319
2Sedgwick20863470448

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Zunli Lu
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.42
Mike Heinz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.28
Philip Smith
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Adolfo Gonzalez Garza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Chris Gould
published 3.5
Evan Prosser
published 3.5
3.19
Thomas Umina
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.15
Matthew Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Dana Cartwright
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.87
Gururaj Krishnan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dan Ferguson
published 3
JP Sabourin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.30
Ronald Ferguson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Cartwright + Thomas Umina1436% games−1.6% vs expected
Dana Cartwright + Philip Smith134 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Harvey + Mike Heinz224 matchesnot enough data
Philip Smith + JP Sabourin044 matchesnot enough data
JP Sabourin + Thomas Umina314 matchesnot enough data
Dan Ferguson + Ronald Ferguson134 matchesnot enough data
Dana Cartwright + JP Sabourin033 matchesnot enough data
Philip Smith + Thomas Umina213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zunli Lu
13W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Mike Heinz
12W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Philip Smith
13W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Adolfo Gonzalez Garza
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Chris Gould
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Evan Prosser
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Umina
13W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Matthew Harvey
23W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Dana Cartwright
23W–46L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3.5
Gururaj Krishnan
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Dan Ferguson
9W–42L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
JP Sabourin
18W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronald Ferguson
3W–43L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.