Teams

JTC Lancaster

2025 Alachua Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.11 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-08-20vs JTC ZaldivarWon 10
W#1 DoublesDanielle Jake-schoffman / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Silvia Menendez / George Demopoulos7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGregg Fissenden / Marianne Eberhard vs Angie Gomez / Anthony Gonzalez1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPhilip Lancaster / Tiffany Schmidt vs Linda Garcia-Crespo / Zach Randall1-6, 1-6
2025-08-10vs HCC GibsonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLaura Montauk / Vito Montauk vs Sheena Jones / Michael Malizia6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarianne Eberhard / Philip Lancaster vs Danielle McGriff / Mike Mueller3-6, 2-6
2025-08-03vs Westside NogueraLost 12
L#1 DoublesGregg Fissenden / Helen Ingmarsson vs Corinne Tomasi / Richard Velasco5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLawrence Hooghuis / Danielle Jake-schoffman vs Cameron Swaggerty / Maxim Peterson .6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Montauk / Vito Montauk vs Melissa Justis / Martin Noguera0-6, 2-6
2025-08-01vs DB GerlingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGregg Fissenden / Helen Ingmarsson vs Mary Butterworth / Paul Wesson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLawrence Hooghuis / Danielle Jake-schoffman vs Rick Carlson / Faun Carlson4-6, 1-6
2025-07-28vs JTC ZaldivarLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhilip Lancaster / Helen Ingmarsson vs Cassie Johnson / JASON BROMIRSKI2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-07-25vs 300 Wimsett/GerberLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Athearn / Gregg Fissenden vs Ludivine Kail / Don Monk2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Montauk / Vito Montauk vs Julie Redding / Enrique Vargas3-6, 4-6
2025-07-24vs Westside NogueraSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDanielle Jake-schoffman / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Ines Gordo / Pedro Rodrigues4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGregg Fissenden / Helen Ingmarsson vs Corinne Tomasi / Martin Noguera7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-18vs HCC GibsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGregg Fissenden / Stefanie Gazda vs Paul Lipori / Karyn Governale3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Kim / Laura Montauk vs Corey Mearns / Ingrid Peggs6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDanielle Jake-schoffman / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Keith Myers / Naomi Nelson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-29vs DB GerlingLost 03
L#1 DoublesPhilip Lancaster / Patricia Woolley vs Jazmyn Broxton / DALTON IEIRI3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Montauk / Vito Montauk vs Nelson Brunsting / Margaret Fita1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLawrence Hooghuis / Lisa Athearn vs Jennifer Gerling / Donovan Bailey1-6, 3-6
2025-06-22vs 300 Wimsett/GerberLost 01
L#1 DoublesTiffany Schmidt / Philip Lancaster vs Iryna Zasimovich / Yury Zasimovich1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Lawrence Hooghuis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.94
Helen Ingmarsson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Melinda Hartline
published
2.92
Laura Montauk
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.79
Gary Orr
published 3
2.70
Blythe Karow
published 3
2.68
Tiffany Schmidt
published
2.68
Patricia Woolley
published
2.59
Gregg Fissenden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.57
Philip Lancaster
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.56
Attila Bodo
published 3
2.52
Yoonsuk Park
published
2.49
Stefanie Gazda
published
2.45
Marianne Eberhard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Lancaster + Blythe Karow3740% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Woolley + Gary Orr314 matchesnot enough data
Blythe Karow + Gregg Fissenden134 matchesnot enough data
Philip Lancaster + Marianne Eberhard123 matchesnot enough data
Helen Ingmarsson + Gregg Fissenden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lawrence Hooghuis
53W–135L career · 8 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Helen Ingmarsson
42W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
2.94
Melinda Hartline
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3.5
Laura Montauk
99W–157L career · 7 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.92
3
Danielle Jake-schoffman
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Gary Orr
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Blythe Karow
45W–105L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Tiffany Schmidt
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Patricia Woolley
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Gregg Fissenden
24W–83L career · 6 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Philip Lancaster
90W–227L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Attila Bodo
0W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Yoonsuk Park
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Stefanie Gazda
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Marianne Eberhard
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.