Teams

Dentoni - Wildcats

2026 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.21 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesCarina Villagra / Angela Bijlani vs Ruxandra Badiu / Carol Darling3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Ramirez / Beth Gregory vs Lisa Yazdani / Sandra Murcia6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCaroline Storer / Cindy Pohoryles vs Anita Sharma / Kelly Cipolla0-6, 3-6
2026-03-11vs Cornelius - Candy Corn ComboWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngela Helder / Gail Ribas vs Megan Rappolt / Louise Smith6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Ramirez / Suzanne Singer vs Grace Wei / Lemin Xiao6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesCaroline Storer / Lisa Thomas vs Heather FREIDKIN / Natalie Watkins3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Gregory / Nilam Patel vs Marie Israelite / Andrea Smolen6-1, 7-5
2026-02-24vs Ahmed - Get A Grip!Lost 12
L#1 DoublesVictoria Quint / Mia Dentoni vs Kelly Kennedy / Gay Trinkner6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNilam Patel / Suzanne Singer vs Julie Chrisco Andrews / Casey Royster2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTamar Henkin / Pamela Gambon vs Claire Graebner / Linda Shaffer7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-20vs Ferentinos - Zack-ManorLost 12
L#1 DoublesGail Ribas / Victoria Quint vs Dawn Willard / Ashley Johnson4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Gregory / Tamar Henkin vs Tammy Griffin / Elizabeth Benko6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarina Villagra / Pamela Gambon vs Karen Dugan / Mary Ferentinos6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-11vs Net NinjasLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Bijlani / Angela Helder vs Tracie Hill / Gaby Aguirre4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Gambon / Carina Villagra vs Kara Stegeman / LaShonne Barnes2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNilam Patel / Suzanne Singer vs Jonaki Bose / Katherine Dodson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-02-04vs Cornelius - Candy Corn ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesGail Ribas / Sarah Ramirez vs Jane Davenport / Leah Jones6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLisa Thomas / Cindy Pohoryles vs Helen Chao / Jinyoung Sohn6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTamar Henkin / Mia Dentoni vs Megan Kane / Lemin Xiao6-1, 6-1
2026-01-21vs Ahmed - Get A Grip!Won 21
W#1 DoublesNilam Patel / Cindy Pohoryles vs Julie Chrisco Andrews / Gay Trinkner6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAngela Bijlani / Angela Helder vs Angela Sharma / Linda Shaffer4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Gambon / Carina Villagra vs Shirin Ahmed / Claire Graebner5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-13vs Ferentinos - Zack-ManorWon 21
L#1 DoublesGail Ribas / Victoria Quint vs Melissa Galloway / Ashley Johnson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Gregory / Angela Helder vs Denise Plude / Vanessa Provencher6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMia Dentoni / Tamar Henkin vs Mary Ferentinos / Elizabeth Benko5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-06vs Net NinjasLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Ramirez / Caroline Storer vs Nicole Ifill / Hrachuhi Babayan4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Singer / Nilam Patel vs Kara Stegeman / Bella Bidzhieva3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Gregory / Mia Dentoni vs Tracie Hill / LaShonne Barnes6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Winter 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Angela Helder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Sarah Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Carina Villagra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Victoria Quint
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Tamar Henkin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Nilam Patel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.05
Caroline Storer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Mia Dentoni
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Cindy Pohoryles
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Gail Ribas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Pamela Gambon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Angela Bijlani
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Suzanne Singer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Gambon + Carina Villagra123 matchesnot enough data
Nilam Patel + Suzanne Singer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Helder
98W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
Sarah Ramirez
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Carina Villagra
16W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Victoria Quint
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Tamar Henkin
116W–147L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Nilam Patel
12W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Caroline Storer
39W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
Mia Dentoni
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Cindy Pohoryles
56W–96L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Gail Ribas
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
Pamela Gambon
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Angela Bijlani
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
Suzanne Singer
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.