Teams

Wetz

Adult 18 & Over League · Adult 18 & Over 3.5M

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrint Harmon / Rob Houser vs Kent Nally / Matthew Counts5-7, 1-6
2026-05-05vs SwartzLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrady Wetz vs Bruce Swartz6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRob Houser / Joshua Tanner vs Jackson Tedder / Walter Reed5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGreg Pearson / Brint Harmon vs Will Lightfoot / Ollie Murr6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-04-28vs RossWon 21
W#1 DoublesOscar Rodriguez / Edward Welch vs Ryan King / Tim Smith6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRiley Hill / Brint Harmon vs Scott Gibbs / CODY CAULEY6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrady Wetz / Blake Phillips vs Bryan Vincent / Cario Dickerson0-6, 1-6
2026-04-21Lost 02
L#1 DoublesEdward Welch / Oscar Rodriguez vs Jon Cauthorn / Boisse Samarripa6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrint Harmon / Rob Houser vs Kent Nally / Matthew Counts0-6, 3-6
2026-04-14vs NagelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesOscar Rodriguez / Edward Welch vs Dustin Hayden / Ryan Barnes3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBrint Harmon vs Eric Nagel0-6, 1-6
2026-03-31Split 11
L#1 DoublesGreg Pearson / Brint Harmon vs Ollie Murr / Adam Rodgers1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMike Hooper / Brady Wetz vs Dave Schaller / Will Lightfoot7-5, 6-4
2026-03-24vs RossLost 02
L#1 DoublesEdward Welch / Greg Pearson vs Ryan King / Tim Smith6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Burgoyne / Rob Houser vs Cario Dickerson / Scott Gibbs1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Adult 18 & Over 3.5M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Swartz34132250355
2Wetz25132248332

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Edward Welch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Caleb Felts
published 3.5
3.19
Brint Harmon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.07
Rob Houser
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Brady Wetz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Blake Phillips
published 3
Oscar Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rob Houser + Brady Wetz123 matchesnot enough data
Edward Welch + Oscar Rodriguez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Edward Welch
34W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Caleb Felts
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Brint Harmon
33W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Rob Houser
6W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Brady Wetz
17W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Blake Phillips
2W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Oscar Rodriguez
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.