Teams

Cooper 18+ TriLevel STK

2023 Tri-Level 18 & Over-EC · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesKaylee Ragan / Lauren Cooper vs Whitney Clardy / Kathryn Phillips6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesBREANA NORTON / Kerstin Tuck vs Sarah Huerkamp / Cyndi Sullivan1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Cougle / Kristen Vance vs Emily Waters / Sara Brown2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKaylee Ragan / Kerstin Tuck vs Heather Logan / Sarah Bean4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJana Berkery / Lauren Cooper vs Savannah Thaler / Heather Clardy4-6, 5-7
2023-07-20vs Callaway18+ 3.5-2.5 - Columbus - MTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBREANA NORTON / Allie Comer vs Emily Anne Callaway / Sarah Huerkamp6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Claire Spradling / Lauren Cooper vs Sara Brown / Katye Baldwin6-3, 7-5
L#1 DoublesKerstin Tuck / Allie Comer vs Emma Graf / Karen Clay5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Cooper / Kristen Vance vs Leah Howard / Allyson Jones6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesBREANA NORTON / Lura Jordan vs Heather Logan / Karen Clay3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Cougle / Jana Berkery vs April Barlow / Allyson Jones4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesBREANA NORTON / Allie Comer vs Ann Swedenburg / Cyndi Sullivan5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Claire Spradling / Kristen Vance vs Emily Anne Callaway / Sara Brown6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cooper 18+ TriLevel STK000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
BREANA NORTON
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Allie Comer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anna Claire Spradling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jana Berkery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Cougle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kaylee Ragan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kristen Vance
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lura Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jana Berkery + Lura Jordan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
BREANA NORTON
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.96
Allie Comer
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Anna Claire Spradling
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jana Berkery
2W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Cougle
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kaylee Ragan
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristen Vance
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lura Jordan
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.