Teams

Barefoot PNCC Combo

2025 South East Tennis Combo 40 & OVER · Men 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-10-26vs Peterson 7.5 - 40+Split 11
W#2 DoublesEdward Everett / Christopher Soule vs Richard Davis / Wesley Edwards6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYoung O'Connor / JONATHAN BALKCUM vs Steve Peterson / Jason Weddle0-6, 4-6
2025-10-21vs Peterson 7.5 - 40+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Barefoot / Michael Duckworth vs Jeremy Lozito / Jason Weddle5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-19vs MICKLER/BENSONLost 02
L#1 DoublesEdward Everett / John Schoolfield vs Derek Mickler / YI HUANG6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChad Corbin / Michael Duckworth vs Nick Basta / Adam Pflaumer4-6, 1-6
2025-10-02vs MICKLER/BENSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Duckworth / James Seidel vs Adam Pflaumer / Clayton Ferner6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBill Leonard / Chad Fortun vs Michael McManus / YI HUANG7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTravis Dant / Ed Vogelsong vs Matt Fox / Dale Benson4-6
2025-09-18vs MICKLER/BENSONLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Barefoot / Ben Hawkins vs Nick Basta / Adam Pflaumer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-14vs Peterson 7.5 - 40+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChad Corbin / Christopher Soule vs Brendan Bastable / Albert Cottle1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEdward Everett / Young O'Connor vs Steve Peterson / Johannes Haasbroek4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBen Hawkins / Ed Vogelsong vs Richard Davis / Wesley Edwards4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-07vs MICKLER/BENSONWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Soule / Chad Corbin vs Craig Pope / Adam Pflaumer7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJames Seidel / John Schoolfield vs Dale Benson / James Vest6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEdward Everett / Bill Leonard vs Michael McManus / YI HUANG6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-02vs Peterson 7.5 - 40+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Barefoot / Chad Corbin vs Bryan McCabe / Johannes Haasbroek6-7, 3-6
2025-08-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Barefoot / John Schoolfield vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-19vs Peterson 7.5 - 40+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Barefoot / JONATHAN BALKCUM vs Matthew Hilliard / Jason Weddle4-6, 1-6
2025-08-14vs MICKLER/BENSONWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Barefoot / Ben Hawkins vs Dale Benson / Matt Fox6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Bill Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Ed Vogelsong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
James Seidel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Michael Barefoot
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Christopher Soule
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Young O'Connor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Ben Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
JONATHAN BALKCUM
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Michael Duckworth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Edward Everett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Chad Corbin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Travis Dant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Chad Fortun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
John Schoolfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Duckworth + Edward Everett6554% games+4.3% vs expected
Ed Vogelsong + Michael Barefoot5256% gamesnot enough data
Ben Hawkins + JONATHAN BALKCUM4155% gamesnot enough data
Chad Corbin + JONATHAN BALKCUM314 matchesnot enough data
Chad Corbin + Ben Hawkins213 matchesnot enough data
Chad Corbin + Christopher Soule123 matchesnot enough data
Ben Hawkins + Edward Everett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Leonard
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Ed Vogelsong
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
James Seidel
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Michael Barefoot
199W–122L career · 15 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Christopher Soule
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Young O'Connor
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Ben Hawkins
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
JONATHAN BALKCUM
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Michael Duckworth
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Edward Everett
25W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Chad Corbin
16W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Travis Dant
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Chad Fortun
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
John Schoolfield
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.