← Teams

MPRC-Brinck

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Lupine Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Ann-Marie Lundberg
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Dipali Dixit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results5 ties
2020-03-07Split 1–1
W#1 SinglesAnn-Marie Lundberg vs Alana Miner6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDipali Dixit / Hitomi Tamura vs Michelle Ellett / Julia Henry1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-02-16Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJing Li / Lupine Swanson vs Patricia Nierenberg / Hoyun Barr6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnn-Marie Lundberg vs Lanetta Ward6-1, 6-1
2020-01-25Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesAnn-Marie Lundberg vs Michiyo Nozaki1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJing Li / Lupine Swanson vs Manisha Thakkar / Mihee Park6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2020-01-18Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesHitomi Tamura / Ann-Marie Lundberg vs Jennifer Steward / Valerie Regan7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2020-01-11Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesDipali Dixit / Victoria Chamberlain vs Jennifer Drew / Judith Meyer6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Lupine Swanson
59W–24L career
0%96%3%
3.34
3.5
Ann-Marie Lundberg
63W–71L career
41%59%0%
2.97
3
Dipali Dixit
40W–48L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.