Teams

V - Summer Sunset

2021 USTA Adult 40 &Over · Ventura - Women 4.0 WE

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-31vs V - LLW-SunsetSummerHeat-DahlbergLost 01
L#1 SinglesGrace Berman vs Hanneli Schuster2-6, 3-6
2021-07-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesWyne Quinn vs Dana Lavenant6-2, 6-0
2021-07-17vs V - Pierpont Wack It ClubLost 02
L#1 DoublesWyne Quinn / SANDI WISE vs Megan Butler / Julie Porrazzo6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGrace Berman vs Nathalie Smith4-6, 3-6
2021-07-10vs V - Arroyo Vista Vintage DivasLost 02
L#1 SinglesSANDI WISE vs Cheri Ackermann3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesWyne Quinn / Ruth White vs Nancy Pierson / Stefanie Wah2-6, 0-6
2021-06-26vs V - Moranda Park Kona KrushWon 21
L#1 DoublesRuth White / SANDI WISE vs Darcie Ouerbacker / Joy Henning4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesGrace Berman vs Pamela Browneller6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLynn Hertz / Wyne Quinn vs Lisa Brady / Dawn Balk6-2, 6-1
2021-06-13vs V - Ojai Let-Love-WinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCheryl Kalinke / Wyne Quinn vs Kathrina Cruz / Deborah Herron4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSANDI WISE vs Heather Miller6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Cheryl Kalinke
published 4
3.58
Wyne Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.51
Lynn Hertz
published
3.46
Laura Berger
published
3.38
SANDI WISE
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Grace Berman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Kate Centanni
published
3.21
Pam Schuberg
published
2.96
Marie Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Smith + Pam Schuberg4157% games+2.6% vs expected
SANDI WISE + Wyne Quinn7461% gamesnot enough data
Grace Berman + SANDI WISE033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Kalinke
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Wyne Quinn
103W–92L career · 5 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.58
Lynn Hertz
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
Laura Berger
12W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
SANDI WISE
187W–162L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Grace Berman
29W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kate Centanni
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Pam Schuberg
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Marie Smith
14W–17L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.