Teams

LTFC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-24vs WC NAVYWon 10
W#2 SinglesSteven Naviaux vs Jeffrey Burton6-4, 6-0
2021-05-17vs HFII REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesSteven Naviaux / Volodymyr Sukhovetskyy vs Zane Dowty / Bradley Cole6-0, 6-1
2021-05-03vs KC TEALWon 10
W#3 DoublesSteven Naviaux / Eric Thorn vs MIKE THROCKMORTON / Dean Ogawa6-0, 6-1
2021-04-26vs VC YELLOWWon 10
W#2 SinglesSteven Naviaux vs Tom Chichester7-5, 6-0
2021-04-19vs WC NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Randazzo / Steven Naviaux vs David Moreno / Pete Petrou6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

AJ Howard
published 4
3.35
David Lash
published 3.5
3.30
Steven Naviaux
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Arthur Michaels
published 3.5
3.24
John Randazzo
published
3.04
Mitchell Kaplan
published
2.75
Eric Thorn
published 3
Alexander Bridge
published
Darren Cutter
published
Jeff Handlin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Lash + Mitchell Kaplan7169% games+20.5% vs expected
Jeff Handlin + David Lash3253% games+6.0% vs expected
Jeff Handlin + AJ Howard303 matchesnot enough data
David Lash + Eric Thorn213 matchesnot enough data
David Lash + AJ Howard213 matchesnot enough data
AJ Howard + John Randazzo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AJ Howard
55W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
David Lash
86W–38L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Steven Naviaux
78W–43L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Arthur Michaels
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
John Randazzo
64W–27L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Mitchell Kaplan
96W–54L career · no lines in 2021
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Eric Thorn
10W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.75
Alexander Bridge
4W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Darren Cutter
16W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Handlin
15W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Volodymyr Sukhovetskyy
13W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.