Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Montgomery-WN/SA

2024 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.39 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-30vs SGV LLW Crickets-Salvador-APU/SU2Won 10
W#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ vs Ben Lopez / Cesar Garcia6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2024-06-23vs SGV LLW Crickets-Salvador-APU/SU2Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEVAN CHANG / ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ vs Cesar Garcia / Chad Rodriguez5-7, 2-6
2024-05-11vs SGV LLW Crickets-Salvador-APU/SU2Won 10
W#2 DoublesGrant Jape / EVAN CHANG vs Karan Patel / Joey Takehara7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-04Lost 01
L#2 SinglesEVAN CHANG vs Angelino Mollo1-6, 1-6
2024-04-21vs SGV LLW Crickets-Salvador-APU/SU2Split 11
W#2 DoublesGrant Jape / EVAN CHANG vs Ben Lopez / Paul Vincent Salvador6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKy Vo / TEVIN JENKINS vs Joshua Chou / Shawn Gunadi3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Edgar Bove
published 5
4.33
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
published 4.5
Andrew Hwang
published 4.5
4.22
Ryan Cox
published
4.20
Gavin Lau
published 4.5
4.15
TEVIN JENKINS
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Ky Vo
published
3.99
EVAN CHANG
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.97
Keith Vazquez
published
3.85
Grant Jape
published 4
3.83
Jermaine Montgomery
published
3.77
Fangrui Chen
published 4
3.75
Jesse Rosas
published
3.49
Willie Yeh
published
Kyle McCain
published
Robert Birmingham
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Edgar Bove
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.53
4.5
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Andrew Hwang
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Cox
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Gavin Lau
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
TEVIN JENKINS
105W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
4.15
Ky Vo
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
4.5
EVAN CHANG
97W–139L career · 5 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.99
Keith Vazquez
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Grant Jape
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.85
Jermaine Montgomery
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.83
4
Fangrui Chen
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Jesse Rosas
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Charles Villarino
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Willie Yeh
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
Kyle McCain
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Birmingham
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.