Teams

A9 Hermitage Dodson

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-07vs A1 Westwood Mullahy-HesterWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Betz / Andrew Bolyard vs Lonnie Lemco / James Moslow6-0, 6-1
2023-05-23vs A7 Avalon Ghita/CalhounWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Bolyard / Kelby Morgan vs Robert Calhoun / Ian Shupack6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-16vs A5 KRA HackettWon 10
W#2 SinglesAndrew Bolyard vs Jay Harter6-0, 6-1
2023-04-25vs A8 Willow Oaks SibleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Gardner / Andrew Bolyard vs Bernly Bressler / Alex Burnett6-3, 6-1
2023-04-11vs A4 Woodlake McCoyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Bolyard / Dennis Dodson vs Dave McCoy / Kyle Patterson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Kelby Morgan
published
3.61
Daniel Sadusky
published 4
3.43
Scott Frazier
published
3.40
Patrick Fagan
published
3.36
Andrew Bolyard
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Jon Nystrom
published
3.33
Turner Broughton
published
Daniel Essad
published 3.5
3.16
JR Pruden
published
3.11
Ted Cummings
published
2.93
Ted Jurkuta
published
Brian Betz
published 3
Will Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Fagan + Scott Frazier4257% games+8.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelby Morgan
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Daniel Sadusky
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Scott Frazier
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Patrick Fagan
18W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Andrew Bolyard
126W–78L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.36
Jon Nystrom
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Turner Broughton
27W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Daniel Essad
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
JR Pruden
29W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.16
Ted Cummings
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Ted Jurkuta
18W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Brian Betz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Will Martin
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.