Teams

PD40/Weaver/FTC

2022 STA Adult Combo 40 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Katie Hensley
published
3.81
Druanne Freeman
published 4
3.49
Beth Gunter
published 3.5
3.47
Pat Pitiranggon
published
3.46
Lucy OHare
published
3.44
Jo Ann Nance
published
3.42
Shelly Brand
published
3.31
Tracie Cassidy
published
3.29
ALISON THOMPSON
published 3.5
3.29
Brenda Echandy
published 3.5
3.28
Lyndy Graham
published
Ann Carey
published 3.5
3.22
Betsy Graham
published 3.5
3.16
Merryn Weaver
published
3.16
Ophillia Dominique
published
3.14
Laura Buen Abad
published
Shannon Grant
published
Sharon Burner
published
Stacy Magee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Pitiranggon + Ophillia Dominique8551% games−5.0% vs expected
Jo Ann Nance + Druanne Freeman3346% games−8.6% vs expected
Merryn Weaver + Ann Carey134 matchesnot enough data
Laura Buen Abad + Beth Gunter224 matchesnot enough data
Katie Hensley + Pat Pitiranggon404 matchesnot enough data
Merryn Weaver + Tracie Cassidy123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Hensley + Sharon Burner303 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Graham + Lyndy Graham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Hensley
43W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Druanne Freeman
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Beth Gunter
29W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.49
Pat Pitiranggon
43W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
Lucy OHare
57W–42L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
Jo Ann Nance
18W–21L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
Shelly Brand
24W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Tracie Cassidy
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
ALISON THOMPSON
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Brenda Echandy
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Lyndy Graham
34W–20L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Ann Carey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Betsy Graham
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Merryn Weaver
21W–31L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
Ophillia Dominique
41W–32L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
Laura Buen Abad
15W–23L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Shannon Grant
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Burner
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacy Magee
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.