Teams

Compton/LR/Reb

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-21vs Webster/Conway/RebsLost 12
L#1 SinglesMary Claire McLaurin vs Amy Webster1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLexie Lybrand vs Joyce Adame2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKelly Hall vs Mary Jane Adame6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-12-16vs Bartlett/Sherwood/STCLost 12
L#1 SinglesCristie Hughes vs Florencia Bruzatori2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKelli Rawn vs Christi Callaway6-2, 7-6
L#3 SinglesJordan Gaiser vs Jennifer Compton5-7, 2-6
2025-12-10vs Virden/LR/RebLost 12
W#1 SinglesLexie Lybrand vs Emily Mason4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMary Claire McLaurin vs Wendy Dawson3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKristi Shirley vs Paige Shields6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-12-02vs Gillispie/LR/RebsWon 21
W#1 SinglesCristie Hughes vs Holly Driver7-5, 4-1
L#2 SinglesKristi Shirley vs Carole George6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKelly Hall vs MacKenzie Cole7-6, 6-2
2025-11-12vs Bulmanski/LR/PVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesCristie Hughes vs Sophie Brandt6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMary Claire McLaurin vs Jennifer Bulmanski6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKelly Hall vs Heidi Brandt0-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Jared Compton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.72
Kelli Rawn
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.46
Lexie Lybrand
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.43
Mary Claire McLaurin
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.41
Cristie Hughes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.38
Kristi Shirley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.28
Jordan Gaiser
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Kelly Hall
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Claire McLaurin + Kelli Rawn12366% games+13.5% vs expected
Lexie Lybrand + Kristi Shirley134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Compton
32W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Kelli Rawn
33W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%6%94%
2.72
Lexie Lybrand
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Mary Claire McLaurin
20W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.43
3
Cristie Hughes
12W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.41
Kristi Shirley
19W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Jordan Gaiser
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Kelly Hall
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.